Share Print Page
 

LIFE SCIENCES

Nixon Peabody offers a highly integrated, cross-practice approach to serving the complete legal needs of life sciences companies. Consistent with the firm’s emphasis on collaboration and team work, more than 50 attorneys across the firm work seamlessly on the full range of transactional, regulatory, and litigation challenges faced by pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device companies.

Our approach to serving the life sciences industry is to consider legal services in the context of the company life cycle. Whether developing devices or drug formulations, life sciences companies face unique challenges:

  • Start-up: Concerns about time-to-market limiting pool of potential investors
  • Financing: Keep promising, but unproven, technologies funded
  • Research & Development: Increasing regulatory scrutiny by the FDA
  • IP Protection: Patentability questions associated with emerging technologies
  • Sales & Marketing: Investigations focused on sales force management, labeling, and marketing practices

Recognizing that the legal issues faced at each stage of the company life cycle can be complex, Nixon Peabody’s corporate, regulatory, and litigation attorneys work together to bring diversity of perspectives and experience to solutions:

  • University research centers are connected to capital that bridges the funding gap between seed money and private equity through a team experienced in intellectual property, tax exempt financing, and charitable trusts.
  • Emerging companies secure financial backing in tandem with needed patent protection from our team of corporate and intellectual property attorneys.
  • Venture capital firms work with corporate, FDA, and intellectual property lawyers who perform necessary regulatory and intellectual property due diligence as part of the investment and financing transaction.
  • Established companies work with an interdisciplinary sales and marketing team that addresses pricing, advertising, privacy, and regulatory enforcement concerns to assure compliance with marketing products.

At Nixon Peabody, we understand that to be effective, we need to consider your company’s place in its life cycle, the issues you face in advancing to the next stage, and which of our attorneys and professional specialists bring the most relevant resources to your team. This highly industry-focused, client-centric approach is unusual among law firms, and differentiates our life sciences services.

Representative Corporate, Regulatory, and Transactional Matters:

  • Representing a Canadian company in coordinating the research, development and licensing of medical isotope technology with a U.S. Government laboratory and state university.
  • Representing a start-up company developing a care model for diabetes in the licensing of intellectual property from a university and the formation of a joint venture with a bioinformatics company to develop and commercialize the technology.
  • Represented the world's largest biological resource center and the most comprehensive source of reference cultures and reagents used by researchers, in negotiating and drafting numerous distribution and development agreements with companies throughout the world.
  • Counseling a large biologics company, providing an opinion on the eligibility of its new drug product for marketing exclusivity and patent term extension.
  • Representing a medical device company in responding to an FDA import detention and refusal involving products made by its contract manufacturer in China, and responding to a Form FDA-483, Inspectional Observations, regarding compliance with Current Good Manufacturing Practice (“CGMP”) requirements.
  • Assisting a large biologics manufacturer on the preparation of a challenge to an FDA decision awarding orphan drug exclusivity to a competitor.
  • Represented a biologics company in preparing and obtaining a successful response to a citizen’s petition from the FDA. The problem involved limits on orphan drug designation.
  • Advised a biopharmaceutical company focused on new drugs candidates targeting GPCR, in a multi-million dollar financing.
  • Advised a company specializing in proton therapy treatment, in its $10 million financing from existing shareholders.
  • Advised a French biopharmaceutical company in its fund raising from seed to Series A, B and C rounds, and on a broad range of matters such as build-up operations, mergers, spin-off, asset deals, employment and executive management remuneration and incentive packages, joint venture agreements, and partnerships.
  • Represented a biotechnology company focused on novel pharmaceutical therapies that seek to exploit RNA editing and DNA editing enzymes, in negotiating a license into the company relating to its core technology, and represent the company with regard to the creation and maintenance of its stock option plan and other general legal matters.
  • Represented a growth-stage medical device company focused on the development of biodegradable silk-based scaffolds for use in tissue regeneration in numerous therapeutic areas in its sale to a multi-specialty health care company that develops pharmaceuticals, biologics, medical devices and over-the-counter consumer products.
  • Represented a Swedish medicinal and analytical chemistry company in the acquisition of two product lines and associated business from a leading provider of cutting-edge technologies in the life science industry.
  • Represent a well-known biopharmaceutical company in a variety of real estate transactions including leasing, permitting, construction contracting, and financing, related to multiple client facilities and offices.
  • Handle leasing work on behalf of a large manufacturer of analytical and medical instruments.

Representative Litigation Matters:

  • Represented the plaintiff, a well-known medical device company, in a patent infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Our client was awarded a multi- million dollar verdict for lost profits and a 16% royalty (on sales not included in lost profits).
  • Represented one of the largest healthcare companies in the world in connection with the company’s global settlement of three separate government investigations for $3 billion—the largest health care fraud settlement in U.S. history. Of the three investigations, Nixon Peabody attorneys were the primary counsel for the company in the defense of an investigation by the Department of Justice relating to the company’s Medicaid “best price” reporting. Our attorneys were also significantly involved in the defense of the investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts relating to the government’s allegations of off-label promotion and anti-kickback violations. The case settled favorably for our client.
  • Represented the plaintiff, a leading medical device company, in a patent infringement case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case was settled on terms favorable to our client.
  • Served as Counsel for over 66 pharmaceutical companies in role as liaison counsel for Average Wholesale Pricing matters venued in commercial court in New York. The case was favorably resolved for our clients.
  • Currently defending Shire Human Genetic Therapies in a Lanham Act false advertising case brought by Genzyme.
  • Represented a pharmacy chain and a national grocery store and in a putative class action in the Northern District of California involving alleged inflation of average wholesale pricing (AWP) for prescription drugs by national pharmacy chains Supervalu Inc., New Albertson’s Inc., Walgreens Co., Longs Drugs Stores Corp., The Kroger Co., Safeway Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Inc., CVS Caremark Corp., and Rite Aid Corp. In January 2010, the case was dismissed with prejudice by the trial court for failure to state a claim. On February 9, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the trial court’s dismissal.

Thought Leadership/Alerts

CMS to hold town hall teleconference for physicians and teaching hospitals regarding the Physician Payment Sunshine Act
Health Alert | May 10, 2013

Hospitals and other providers of medical services and devices may find themselves subject to federal contractor requirements
Health Law Alert | April 25, 2013

. . . View all . . .

Recall or product enhancement? Medical device manufacturers invited to comment on proposed FDA guidance
Pharmaceutucal, Medical Device & Life Sciences Alert | February 26, 2013

Webinar Recording: The New World of Raising Capital in Life Sciences
Originally recorded December 13, 2012 | December 14, 2012

Webinar Recording: The First Amendment and Off-Label Promotion: Understanding the Implications of U.S. v. Caronia
Originally recorded December 5, 2012 | December 6, 2012

Personalized Medicine Patent Watch
Intellectual Property Alert | October 31, 2012

Nixon Peabody's 2012 MAC Survey
October 22, 2012

Webinar Recording: Leveraging Philanthropic Capital to Fund Life Science Companies and University Spin-outs
Originally recorded September 24, 2012 | September 26, 2012

Personalized Medicine Patent Watch Update
Intellectual Property Alert | July 9, 2012

Webinar Recording: Avoiding the Glare of Government Scrutiny: Understanding the implications of the Physician Payment Sunshine Act
Originally recorded June 28, 2012 | July 2, 2012

Supreme Court holds that pharmaceutical reps meet the outside sales exemption to the FLSA
Employment Law Alert | June 18, 2012

HHS releases proposed rule on Stage 2 requirements for meaningful use of EHRs
Health Law Alert | March 9, 2012

FDA issues biosimilar draft guidance
FDA Alert | February 28, 2012

Claims to investment tool too "abstract" to be patent eligible under 35 USC § 101
Intellectual Property Alert | February 28, 2012

FDA's draft guidance on social media and off-label communications
FDA Alert | January 26, 2012

At the Brink of Transformation: What Stephen Berger's report means for health care system board members
Health Law Alert | January 26, 2012

Crafting personalized medicine IP protection—walking the thin line between patent eligibility and enforcement
Intellectual Property Alert | January 10, 2012

FAQs on the final ACO regulations
Health Law Alert | December 28, 2011

First true induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) patent issued by the USPTO
Intellectual Property Alert | November 2, 2011

California Court of Appeal affirms award of pre- and post- statutory settlement offer expert witness fees and the reasonableness of a relatively low pretrial settlement offer
Product Liability Alert | November 1, 2011

CMS Releases Final ACO Rule!
Health Law Alert | October 24, 2011

California Supreme Court clarifies limits on recovery of medical expenses in tort actions
Products Liability Alert | August 23, 2011

Ninth Circuit clarifies jurisdiction rules in intellectual property cases brought against out-of-state companies operating on the Internet
Intellectual Property Alert | August 16, 2011

Seeing red: NY court refuses to enforce single color trademark for shoe design
Intellectual Property Alert | August 15, 2011

First Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC) Patent Approved by the EPO
Intellectual Property Alert | August 2, 2011

Federal Circuit issues opinion in ACLU v. Myriad
Intellectual Property Alert | July 29, 2011

OCR begins HIPAA compliance auditing program – Are you prepared?
HIPAA Law Alert | July 29, 2011

New Texas health care privacy law more stringent than HIPAA
HIPAA Law Alert | July 21, 2011

Patent reform primer
Changes to the grace period

Intellectual Property Alert | July 14, 2011

IRS issues Notice and request for comments on the community health needs assessment requirements for certain tax-exempt hospitals
Health Law Alert | July 14, 2011

OCR settles HIPAA violations with UCLA Health System for $865,500
HIPAA Law Alert | July 13, 2011

Legislation headed to Governor’s desk granting health care providers additional rights in OMIG audits
Health Law Alert | July 8, 2011

Personal jurisdiction: Is no news from the Supreme Court good news for foreign product manufacturers?
Products Liability Alert | June 30, 2011

Immigration compliance: What Every Employer Needs to Know; Audits, Audits, Everywhere
Immigration Law Alert | June 29, 2011

New .XXX domain name tentatively scheduled to launch September 7, 2011 — clients are advised they may be able to block certain domains to prevent future use
Intellectual Property Alert | June 21, 2011

U.S. PTO Restriction Practice: Personalized medicine claims with SNPs
Intellectual Property Alert | June 13, 2011

FATCA as applied to investment funds: suggested fund agreement provisions
Private Equity Alert | June 10, 2011

Employers (particularly universities): check your invention assignment agreements!
Intellectual Property Alert | June 7, 2011

Webinar Recording: 2011: The Stem Cell Odyssey Continues
June 3, 2011

Therasense decision highlights specific intent requirement for inequitable conduct determinations
Intellectual Property Alert | June 1, 2011

HHS issues notice of proposed rulemaking for new standards for accounting of disclosures of protected health information including the right to an access report
HIPAA Law Alert | June 1, 2011

U.S. Supreme Court upholds Arizona E-Verify law
Immigration Law Alert | May 31, 2011

Follow-on Biologics legislation has immediate impact on patent holders
Intellectual Property Alert | May 25, 2011

Recent New York Court of Appeals decision addresses disclosure and use of patient medical records in Assisted Outpatient Treatment proceedings
HIPAA Law Alert | May 24, 2011

I-9 Central: A new user-friendly, online resource for employers and employees
Immigration Law Alert | May 18, 2011

Protecting personalized medicine innovation in China and India: Are diagnostic methods patentable?
Intellectual Property Alert | May 17, 2011

New York general hospitals, nursing homes, home care services agencies, special needs assisted living residences, enhanced assisted living residences, attending physicians, and nurse practitioners now obligated to provide palliative care information to terminally-ill patients
Health Law Alert | April 27, 2011

OASAS proposes significant changes to its standards for chemical dependence outpatient and opioid treatment providers
Health Law Alert | April 22, 2011

Analysis of Proposed ACO Regulations Issued March 31, 2011
Health Law Alert | April 20, 2011

A patent in 12 months? But it will cost you!
Intellectual Property Alert | April 6, 2011

Federal Circuit hears oral argument on Myriad ”gene patents”
Intellectual Property Alert | April 4, 2011

Opportunity to comment on implementation of new home care program
Health Law Alert | April 4, 2011

Amnesty period to unwind laboratory EHR donations ends April 15, 2011
Health Law Alert | April 1, 2011

U.S. Supreme Court declines to adopt bright-line rule that adverse drug reaction reports are not material unless they are statistically significant
Securities Litigation Alert | March 28, 2011

The Federal Circuit holds that the heightened pleading standards of Rule 9(b) apply to false patent marking claims, finding general allegations of “sophistication” and “knowledge” to be insufficient to state a claim under Section 292
Intellectual Property Alert | March 15, 2011

New York State Medicaid Redesign Team marches forward and issues recommendations
Health Law Alert | March 1, 2011

Strong message from HHS/OCR with two HIPAA privacy rule enforcements within one week
HIPAA Law Alert | February 28, 2011

U.S. Supreme Court decides that all design-defect claims are preempted by the Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
Products Liability Alert | February 22, 2011

Constitutional challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Health Law Alert | February 3, 2011

New York Medicaid Redesign Team
Health Law Alert | January 14, 2011

CMS soliciting comments on the EMTALA’s applicability to inpatients
Health Law Alert | January 10, 2011

Food Safety Legislation Signed Into Law
Food Safety and Litigation Alert | January 6, 2011

Canada enacts sweeping consumer products safety law
Products Liability Alert | December 21, 2010

Webinar Recording: The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA): Spotlight on the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Industries One Year After the Warning
December 1, 2010

U.S. Supreme Court to revisit personal jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers
Products Liability Alert | November 16, 2010

CMS posts notice soliciting comments on initial regulations for ACOs
Health Law Alert | November 16, 2010

Restrictions on the beneficial use of software
Intellectual Property Alert | November 16, 2010

The NCQA and AMGA issue statements on accountable care organization
Health Law Alert | November 15, 2010

Stricter duty hour rules for medical residents effective July 1, 2011
Health Law Alert | October 6, 2010

HHS regulations allow suspension of Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP Payments following credible fraud allegations
Health Law Alert | October 4, 2010

Significant changes in New York HIV testing law
Health Law Alert | September 29, 2010

It’s the Department of State calling
Immigration Law Alert | September 17, 2010

OSHA enters the duty hours debate as the ACGME prepares to vote on revisions to its duty hour standards later this month
Health Law Alert | September 10, 2010

In Stauffer decision, Federal Circuit finds that qui tam relator has standing to pursue false marking claims under Patent Act
Intellectual Property Alert | August 31, 2010

Impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act on Private Equity Funds and Other Private Pools of Capital
Private Equity Alert | August 19, 2010

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration Releases a Comprehensive Preliminary Assessment on the Regulation of Medical Devices
FDA Alert | August 4, 2010

HHS withdraws breach notification rule from administrative review
HIPAA Law Alert | August 4, 2010

HHS announces Final Rule on meaningful use of EHRs
Health Law Alert | July 13, 2010

HHS/ONC proposed rulemaking expands HIPAA privacy and security rules
Health Law Alert | July 9, 2010

CMS issues proposed regulations that outline criteria for certification of EHR technology
Health Law Alert | July 7, 2010

According to the Patent Office, the machine-or-transformation test is alive and well
Intellectual Property Alert | July 2, 2010

New tax credit or cash grant for qualifying therapeutic discovery projects
Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, and Life Sciences Alert | July 1, 2010

Supreme Court affirms Federal Circuit’s judgment that risk hedging claims not patent eligible; rejects “machine-or-transformation” test as sole test of patent eligibility of process claims
Intellectual Property Alert | June 28, 2010

American Board of Internal Medicine sanctions 139 physicians and sues 5
Health Law Alert | June 15, 2010

In Solo Cup decision, Federal Circuit affirms district court’s ruling on burden of proof for intent to deceive and false marking with expired patents, and confirms the definition of “offenses”
Intellectual Property Alert | June 11, 2010

Federal Trade Commission delays enforcement of Red Flags Rule until December 31, 2010
Health Law Alert | June 1, 2010

Office of Inspector General (OIG) posts Advisory Opinion (AO) on proposed referrals incentive program offered by a continuing care retirement community
Health Law Alert | June 1, 2010

Provisions of the Senate bill to enact reforms in federal regulation of the financial industry would affect private investment funds and their advisers
Private Equity Alert | May 26, 2010

. . . Hide Thought Leadership. . .

Press

Media Clips

  • FDA Cracking Down on Compounders at Historic Pace
    Law360 | April 22, 2013

    Washington, DC, health services and life sciences partner Areta Kupchyk provides commentary in this feature article discussing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s efforts to police the compounding pharmacy sector.

  • Medical App Makers Await Regulator Checkups
    The Recorder | March 15, 2013

    Silicon Valley Global Business & Transactions partner Mavis Yee and Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk are featured throughout this article noting that the mobile medical app industry is awaiting formal regulatory guidelines from lawmakers.

  • Social Media and the De-Identification of Protected Health Information
    Bloomberg BNA Social Media Law & Policy Report | March 12, 2013
    This article, co-authored by partner & leader of the health services practice Michele Masucci and Long Island health services associate Carly Eisenberg, addresses the rising popularity of social media bring new challenges for health care providers. Click here to read the article.
  • . . . View all . . .
  • FDA's New Safety Reports Raise Tort Risks for Device Cos.
    Law360 | March 8, 2013

    Washington, D.C. health services and life sciences partner Areta Kupchyk discusses the Food and Drug Administration’s draft guidance intended to clarify when a change to a medical device should be considered a “recall” versus a “product enhancement.”

  • Life Sciences Editorial Advisory Board
    Law360 | February 11, 2013

    Boston Commercial Litigation and Life Sciences partner Fred Kelly is highlighted among the Life Sciences Law360 editorial advisory board.

  • Attorney Discusses Concerns about FDA MMA Draft Guidance
    FierceMobileHealthcare | February 4, 2013

    Silicon Valley partner Mavis Yee discusses the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's expected final guidance for mobile medical application developers. Click here to read the article.

  • FDA's Authority to Regulate Pharmacy Compounding: Who's Responsible?
    Corporate Compliance Insights | January 16, 2013

    Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk authored this column on the enforcement authority of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulate the creation of a particular pharmaceutical product to fit the unique needs of a patient.

  • Life Sciences Cases to Watch in 2013
    Life Sciences Law 360 | January 1, 2013

    In this article focused on key life sciences industry lawsuits in the coming calendar year, Boston Government Investigations & Life Sciences partner Brian French provides commentary.

  • Life Sciences Regulation to Watch in 2013
    Life Sciences Law 360 | January 1, 2013

    Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk and Boston Government Investigations & Life Sciences partner Brian French discuss key life sciences industry regulations to watch in 2013.

  • FDA Marketing Rules Stretch to Drugmakers' Media Pitches
    Law 360 | November 13, 2012

    Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk comments on the standard practice of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to reprimand companies for any marketing efforts that seem to be unfair or misleading regardless if they are directed at consumers or the media.

  • Top 40 Angelenos to Know in Intellectual Property Law
    Los Angeles Business Journal | October 29, 2012

    Los Angeles Patents partner Seth Levy is profiled in this special section highlighting “Who’s Who” in intellectual property in the region.

  • Handling an FDA inspection: Dos, Don'ts and When to Call a Lawyer
    Corporate Compliance Insights | August 20, 2012

    Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk authored this column discussing how to handle a facilities investigation by the Food and Drug Administration.

  • Washington Roundup: Federal Circuit Broadens Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor
    BioWorld Today | August 7, 2012

    This article recaps a recent U.S. Court of Appeals decision expanding the safe harbor for generic drug makers. Washington, DC, patents counsel Mary Webster is quoted discussing how expanding the safe harbor will affect patent claims.

  • Drug, Device, and Biotechnology Manufacturing Requirements
    Corporate Compliance Insights | July 2, 2012

    This contributed article, authored by Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk, discusses the importance of compliance with current good manufacturing practice regulations established and enforced by the Food and Drug Administration.

  • Off-Label Communications: The FDA's Proposed Approach
    Product Liability Law & Strategy | July 1, 2012

    This article, authored by Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk and Buffalo Products associate Tracey Ehlers, discusses the Food and Drug Administration guidance addressing how drug, biologics, and medical device manufacturers should respond to unsolicited requests for off-label information, including—for the first time—communications via the Internet and social media.

  • Comment: FDA's Draft Guidance on Social Media and Off-Label Communications
    Bloomberg BNA Social Media Law & Policy Report | June 19, 2012
    Washington, DC, Life Sciences and Health Services partner Areta Kupchyk authored this article discussing the Food & Drug Administration’s long-awaited draft guidance on off-label use communications by drug, biologics, and device companies including, specifically, electronic communications using the Internet and social media.
  • Q&A With Nixon Peabody’s Areta Kupchyk
    Life Sciences Law 360 | May 23, 2012

    This Q&A focused on the life sciences industry is conducted with Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk.

  • Business of Law: Nixon Peabody Expands IP Practice in L.A. with Davis Wright Team
    Bloomberg News | May 8, 2012

    This article highlights the arrival of Los Angeles Patents and Life Sciences partner Seth Levy and his team.

  • Q&A With Nixon Peabody’s Fred Kelly
    Life Sciences Law 360 | May 8, 2012

    Boston Commercial Litigation and Life Sciences partner Fred Kelly is featured in this Q&A discussing the life sciences industry.

  • The Park Doctrine and AIP: Two Little-Known But Powerful FDA Enforcement Tools
    Corporate Compliance Insights | April 17, 2012

    Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk authored this column addressing two enforcement tools used by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in response to violations.

  • Strengthening Personalized Medicine Deals
    Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News | March 1, 2012

    Washington, DC, Global Business & Transactions and Life Sciences partner Mark Kass discusses diagnostic collaboration relationships and how to approach these agreements in this legal affairs column.

  • Stem Cells, FDA, and the Edge of Science: Three Expert Viewpoints
    Forbes | February 19, 2012

    This feature article discusses the challenges with regulating stem cell product development. Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk discusses the difficulties involved with regulating cell-based products.

  • FDA’s Draft Guidance on Social Media and Off-Label Communications
    Bloomberg BNA | January 25, 2012
    This contributed article, authored by Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk, discusses the draft guidance issued by the FDA about off-label use communications by drug, biologics, and device companies including, specifically, electronic communications using the Internet and social media.
  • Personalized Medicine Could Hinge on Supreme Court Ruling
    BioWorld Today | December 8, 2011

    This story notes that the future of personalized medicine rests in the hands of the U.S. Supreme Court as it mulls arguments in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories Inc. Patents practice co-leader and member of the firm’s Life Sciences practice David Resnick provides third-party commentary.

  • Nixon Peabody Wins Over FDA Insider From Reed Smith
    Law 360 | December 5, 2011

    This feature article highlights the arrival of Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk.

  • Reed Smith Attorney in D.C. Jumps to Nixon Peabody
    National Law Journal/Blog of Legal Times | November 28, 2011

    This article highlights the arrival of Washington, DC, Health Services and Life Sciences partner Areta Kupchyk.

  • U.S. Anti-Corruption Regulation Risks
    Pharmaceutical Executive | December 1, 2010
    This contributed article, authored by Boston Government Investigations & White Collar Defense partner and member of the Life Sciences practice Brian French, discusses increased enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which requires enhanced global compliance.
  • Stem Cell Decision Could Rewrite Rules of Patentability
    Nature Medicine | June 1, 2010
    This feature article discusses an ongoing embryonic stems cells patent matter and a possible decision that could alter what is patentable in the life sciences industry. Boston Life Sciences partner and co-leader of the firm’s Patents practice David Resnick provides commentary in the piece.
. . . Hide Media Clips . . .

Events

Life Sciences