Text Search: |
Compliance deadline looms for new special enrollment rights created by CHIPRAOvershadowed by the discussion surrounding the Stimulus Bill, the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (“CHIPRA”) was enacted without fanfare on February 4, 2009. CHIPRA created new special enrollment rights, provisions regarding state payment of employee group health plan premiums, and new notice requirements and compliance penalties. The new special enrollment rights will take effect on April 1, 2009. Employers who have not already acted to comply must do so quickly.3/30/2009 Open PDF: Compliance deadline looms for new special enrollment rights created by CHIPRA Overshadowed by the discussion surrounding the Stimulus Bill, the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (“CHIPRA”) was enacted without fanfare on February 4, 2009. CHIPRA created new special enrollment rights, provisions regarding state payment of employee group health plan premiums, and new notice requirements and compliance penalties. The new special enrollment rights will take effect on April 1, 2009. Employers who have not already acted to comply must do so quickly. By way of background, the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (“SCHIP”), enacted in 1997, is a joint federal and state program that provides health insurance to certain low-income children and their families who have too much income to qualify for Medicaid, but too little to afford private health insurance. CHIPRA extended SCHIP, which was set to expire at the end of March, through 2013. It also renamed it the Children’s Health Insurance Program or CHIP. Of primary importance to employers in the short term, CHIPRA creates two new special enrollment rights for CHIP participants under the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”). As noted above, these new rights take effect April 1, 2009:
CHIPRA also directs states to create a process to allow the parent of a child receiving premium assistance to enroll the child in the state’s CHIP and disenroll the child from the employer’s group health plan during any month. This new disenrollment opportunity appears to be inconsistent with the cafeteria plan regulations, which permit disenrollment only upon the occurrence of specified events. We can only hope that the discrepancy will be recognized and remedied by the regulators. Another CHIPRA provision makes it easier for states to provide premium assistance subsidies toward qualified employer coverage where it would be cost-effective do so, rather than enrolling the individual in Medicaid or CHIP. A few states already have such programs in place. The new provisions allow states to provide premium assistance where:
Notably, high deductible health plans and health flexible spending arrangements are excluded from the definition of qualified employer coverage. Employers may opt-out of receiving direct payment of the employee’s premiums from the state. In that case, employers may withhold the employee's share of premiums from his or her pay, and the state will issue the premium assistance reimbursement directly to the employee. CHIPRA also creates a new annual notice requirement. Group health plans must notify employees about any premium assistance program available in the state where the employee resides (which may be different than the state where the employee works). Congress directed the DOL and HHS to create model notices no later than February 4, 2010. The notice requirements will not go into effect until the first plan year following issuance of the model notices. Employers have the option to provide stand-alone notices or to include the notice along with notices of health plan eligibility, open enrollment materials or summary plan descriptions. Employers that do not comply with CHIPRA’s requirements may be subject to fines of up to $100 per day, per participant. Group health plan sponsors should act immediately to implement those requirements that are effective on April For CHIPRA’s other provisions, thankfully, there is more time to comply. The following steps are necessary:
The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct. |
To subscribe to one of our alerts or newsletters, please e-mail Yolanda Jones at yljones@nixonpeabody.com.
Author(s)Steven C. MindyKate Ulrich Saracene ServicesLabor & EmploymentERISA Litigation |
||
![]() |
Boston
Chicago
Los Angeles
London
New York
Paris
Rochester San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Washington Albany Buffalo Long Island Manchester Palm Beach Gardens Providence Disclaimer | Nixon Peabody International | © 2010 Nixon Peabody LLP |