What’s trending on NP Privacy Partner



February 03, 2017

Author(s): Christopher G. Gegwich, Christopher J. Moro, JoAnna Nicholson, Steven M. Richard

Cars can track your moves; Philadelphia limits wage history inquiries; court addresses injuries under FCRA; certification questions arise in Target class action suit; FERPA and public record considerations collide. Here’s what trending in data privacy and cybersecurity.

Consumer Privacy

Consumer guide advises how your car may be tracking you

A guide notifies consumers about how much information they share or permit when driving their cars.—Steven M. Richard

Read More

Employee/Workplace Privacy

Philly takes aggressive stance against wage inequality

The Philadelphia City Council passes legislation prohibiting employers from inquiring, requesting, or relying upon a prospective employee’s wage history.—Christopher G. Gegwich and Christopher J. Moro

Read More

Privacy Litigation

Third Circuit finds Health Plan’s data breach to be de facto injury under FCRA

The Third Circuit weighs in on the Fair Credit Reporting Act in a data breach case against health plan Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey. —JoAnna R. Nicholson

Read More

Eighth Circuit remands Target breach litigation over class certification issues

Eighth Circuit holds that a trial court failed to undertake a sufficiently rigorous review of class certification in Target breach suit.—Steven M. Richard

Read More

Kentucky court balances FERPA and public record considerations

A Kentucky court is the latest to evaluate whether university discipline records are public records subject to production.—Steven M. Richard

Read More

The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.

Back to top