IP litigation during the pandemic

BY Jennifer Hayes, Staci Jennifer Riordan, Deanna R. Kunze

COVID-19 has greatly impacted U.S. litigation on a number of fronts, including cases with intellectual property (IP) issues.

During our webinar, “IP Litigation During the Pandemic,” we discussed a number of these trends and topics, including settlements, virtual discovery, post-COVID case scheduling, and pre-litigation.

We have been interested to observe how companies are pursuing their IP disputes during this uncertain time. Our comprehensive view of the trends in this space helps us to give the best counsel to our own clients and position them for success.

If you weren’t able to join us, here are some of the key takeaways from our conversation.

Finding creative ways to build trust with clients and teams is an increasing priority, especially since we are not able to do this in person.
New IP cases have risen during COVID-19, with a significant number of cases filed in the Western District of Texas. And while some cases have settled during COVID, many are still moving forward.
There’s a continued emphasis on providing excellent service to clients through the adaptation of pre-COVID case strategies. This includes incorporating depositions, hearings, and mediations held remotely. Expect that some of these changes, especially remote depositions and remote mediations, will continue post-COVID.
Adjustments to other discovery procedures are being made as a result of COVID. Remote source code review has produced some of the most impactful changes.

Tags: Webinar, Intellectual Property, Litigation

Search Exactly
Search All Words

Author

Jennifer Hayes

Partner

Posts By this author

Thank you for your request to e-mail Jennifer Hayes.

While you are welcome to contact an attorney at Nixon Peabody LLP, you should be aware that this Web site presents general information about Nixon Peabody LLP and is not intended as legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Please keep in mind that merely contacting Nixon Peabody LLP will not establish an attorney-client relationship. Nixon Peabody LLP cannot represent you until the firm knows there would not be a conflict of interest and the firm determines that it is otherwise able to accept the engagement. Accordingly, please do not send Nixon Peabody LLP any information or documents until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you receive authorization in the form of an engagement letter from Nixon Peabody LLP. Any information or documents sent prior to your receipt of an engagement letter cannot be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature.

Clicking on the link below acknowledges that you understand and agree with this notice.

Continue with e-mail to Jennifer Hayes.

;

Author

Staci Jennifer Riordan

Partner

Posts By this author

Thank you for your request to e-mail Staci Riordan.

While you are welcome to contact an attorney at Nixon Peabody LLP, you should be aware that this Web site presents general information about Nixon Peabody LLP and is not intended as legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Please keep in mind that merely contacting Nixon Peabody LLP will not establish an attorney-client relationship. Nixon Peabody LLP cannot represent you until the firm knows there would not be a conflict of interest and the firm determines that it is otherwise able to accept the engagement. Accordingly, please do not send Nixon Peabody LLP any information or documents until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you receive authorization in the form of an engagement letter from Nixon Peabody LLP. Any information or documents sent prior to your receipt of an engagement letter cannot be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature.

Clicking on the link below acknowledges that you understand and agree with this notice.

Continue with e-mail to Staci Riordan.

;

Author

Deanna R. Kunze

Partner

Posts By this author

Thank you for your request to e-mail Deanna Kunze.

While you are welcome to contact an attorney at Nixon Peabody LLP, you should be aware that this Web site presents general information about Nixon Peabody LLP and is not intended as legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Please keep in mind that merely contacting Nixon Peabody LLP will not establish an attorney-client relationship. Nixon Peabody LLP cannot represent you until the firm knows there would not be a conflict of interest and the firm determines that it is otherwise able to accept the engagement. Accordingly, please do not send Nixon Peabody LLP any information or documents until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established through an interview with an attorney and you receive authorization in the form of an engagement letter from Nixon Peabody LLP. Any information or documents sent prior to your receipt of an engagement letter cannot be treated as confidences, secrets, or protected information of any nature.

Clicking on the link below acknowledges that you understand and agree with this notice.

Continue with e-mail to Deanna Kunze.

;

Nixon Peabody Blog

TRENDING

IP litigation during the pandemic

BY Jennifer Hayes, Staci Jennifer Riordan, Deanna R. Kunze

Tags: Webinar, Intellectual Property, Litigation

TRENDING

IP litigation during the pandemic

BY Jennifer Hayes, Staci Jennifer Riordan, Deanna R. Kunze

Tags: Webinar, Intellectual Property, Litigation

Related Content

Buying a food & beverage business without environmental health...

Up in smoke: ITC institutes investigation of cartridges used to...

2021 Food & Beverage Forum Recap

The brewing battle between climate change and the quality of...

Fifth Circuit Vaccine Mandate Ruling

U.S. Supreme Court to consider fabric design copyright case