Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. In the wake of severe respirator supply shortages, Cal/OSHA issues new guidance for health care facilitiesAlerts

    Alert / OSHA Alert

    In the wake of severe respirator supply shortages, Cal/OSHA issues new guidance for health care facilities

    March 31, 2020

    Share

    On March 28, 2020, Cal/OSHA issued new interim guidance on COVID-19 for health care facilities facing severe respirator supply shortages. This new guidance is a substantial improvement over Cal/OSHA’s former position.

    Summary of the terms of the new guidance

    The new guidance focuses on the Aerosol Transmissible Diseases (ATD) standard (8 CCR Section 5199), and the issues presented by the severe global shortage of respirators, among other personal protective equipment (PPE).

    Of critical importance, Cal/OSHA has reversed its prior position and now authorizes health care facilities to use surgical masks for lower hazard COVID-19 cases when respirator supplies are insufficient for surges, anticipated surges, or when efforts to optimize the efficient use of respirators do not resolve the respirator shortage. Doing so helps health care facilities best protect health care worker safety and health by prioritizing respirators so they are available for use during more hazardous activities. Before the interim guidance was issued, Cal/OSHA was forcing employers to choose between prioritizing scarce respirators or facing willful citations from Cal/OSHA.

    The guidance states that employers must ensure employees are protected by NIOSH-certified powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) during high hazard tasks and aerosol generating procedures. N95 respirators may be used when PAPRs are unavailable due to a surge.

    If an employer is using surgical masks instead of respirators, the employer must certify that:

    • Full compliance with the ATD Standard would exhaust respirator supplies needed to address the surge or anticipated surge, despite reasonable efforts to obtain additional respirators and maximize existing respirator supplies as described below; and
    • The employer complies with all requirements in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines: Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Settings.

    The interim guidance states that although it may not be possible to provide respirators in accordance with Cal/OSHA standards during severe shortages, all other provisions of the ATD standard remain in full effect.

    The interim guidance also provides other strategies and guidance for conserving existing respirator supplies including the following:

    • Using non-disposable respirators instead of filtering facepiece respirators.
    • Using filtering facepiece respirators for extended periods.
    • Developing policies for employees to reuse a filtering facepiece respirator.
    • Using industrial filtering facepiece respirators in health care.
    • Using filtering facepiece respirators after their expiration date.
    • Using facepiece respirators certified to a foreign standard.
    • Allowing employee to wear their own PPE if it complies with Cal/OSHA requirements.

    Issues and concerns with the new guidance

    Although the new interim guidance is a substantial improvement, it still raises significant legal concerns, contains ambiguity, and presents traps for unwary health care facilities:

    • Although the guidance states that N95 respirators may be used when PAPRs are unavailable due to a surge, it provides no definition for the term “unavailable.”
    • Employers should consult with counsel before drafting the required certification. The certification is not required by the ATD standard or CDC guidance and a poorly drafted certification may subject an employer to willful Cal/OSHA citations, serious and willful workers’ compensation claims, additional civil liability from third-party claims, and even criminal charges should any willful violations lead to death or serious injuries or illnesses.
    • Cal/OSHA has imposed several potentially problematic restrictions on the use of surgical masks. Restriction 3 requires that employers ensure “surgical masks are not used for high hazard (aerosol-generating) procedures or nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs specimens.” The ATD standard does not define such swab specimens as a high hazard procedure. 8 CCR 5199(b). Further, the CDC guidelines, which hospitals are required to follow by direction of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), specifically permit surgical masks to be used for such swab samples when a respirator is not available.
    • Restriction 6 states that the CDC guidance is in effect until respirator stockpiles can be restored. We do not know if that is actually correct. Further, this restriction states that employees and their representatives must be told that these changes regarding the use of surgical masks are per CDC guidance. That is actually only partially true and health care providers should consult with counsel about how to accurately provide this information.
    • Guidance regarding Restriction 7 requires complying with the ATD standard once respirator supply chains are restored. On the face of it, this may simply seem obvious. However, it implicitly continues a Cal/OSHA interpretation that the ATD standard does not permit health care facilities to utilize droplet precautions without the new guidance. We believe this interpretation by Cal/OSHA is erroneous based on the ATD standard, so this issue will likely continue to arise once supply chains are restored based on the express language of Appendix A to the ATD standard.
    • Lastly Cal/OSHA suggests that 8 CCR 3380 requires employers to permit employees to wear their own provided PPE. This may well be a good practice in some situations (and may well be appropriate to meet reasonable accommodation obligations). However, it goes beyond what is actually required by 8 CCR 3380 and will trigger a number of other respiratory protection requirements. Employers should discuss this with counsel.

    Locations

    Los AngelesSan Francisco

    Practices

    California Labor & EmploymentOccupational Safety & Health (OSHA)

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      Cal/OSHA issues problematic new COVID-19 interim guidance for health care facilities

      June 23, 2020
    • Alert

      OSHA issues recordkeeping guidance for COVID-19

      April 14, 2020
    • Alert

      Guide to access funding and other key considerations impacting the business of non-hospital health care providers/employers operating small businesses

      March 31, 2020

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL