Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. Landmark legislation allows plaintiffs to invalidate arbitration agreements for sexual harassment and assault claimsAlerts

    Alert / Labor & Employment Alert

    Landmark legislation allows plaintiffs to invalidate arbitration agreements for sexual harassment and assault claims

    March 16, 2022

    Share

    By Andrea Chavez

    Employers must prepare for the impact of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act.

    What’s the Impact?

    • Under the Act, a plaintiff bringing sexual assault and sexual harassment claims can choose arbitration or a jury trial
    • Employers will have to navigate the changes the Act imposes on employment agreements and potential litigation

    DOWNLOADS

    With President Biden signing into law the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (the “Act”) on March 3, 2022, employers should review their form arbitration agreements and consider the impact of the Act on potential litigation of sexual assault and harassment claims.

    The Act allows a plaintiff bringing sexual assault and sexual harassment claims (whether individually or as a representative of a class or collective action) to invalidate predispute arbitration agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act. This means that the person can choose to arbitrate such claims or bring those claims in court for a jury trial.

    Under the Act, “sexual assault dispute” means a dispute involving a nonconsensual sexual act or sexual contact as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2246 or similar applicable tribal or state law, including when the victim lacks capacity to consent. A “sexual harassment dispute” is defined as a dispute relating to conduct that is alleged to constitute sexual harassment under applicable federal, tribal, or state law.

    The applicability of the Act is not based on when the arbitration agreement was signed, but rather when the dispute or claim arose. The Act will apply to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after the date of enactment of the Act, i.e., March 3, 2022.

    Whether an arbitration agreement subject to the Act is enforceable will be determined by a court, and that court will apply federal law in answering that question, even if the parties have agreed to delegate the question of arbitrability to the arbitrator.

    Takeaways

    • The Act does not include general sex discrimination cases (such as issues relating to pay equity, promotions, hiring, and wrongful termination).
    • It is unclear if courts will find the entire arbitration agreement invalid and unenforceable without a carve out for claims related to sexual assault or sexual harassment, or whether courts will limit the potential finding of invalidity and unenforceability to the sexual assault and harassment claims. Given that the Federal Arbitration Act remains intact with respect to other claims, and given that individuals can still choose to bring their sexual assault and harassment claims in arbitration, there does not appear to be any outright ban against including such claims in arbitration agreements. There are no resulting fines or penalties for excluding a carve out of sexual assault or sexual harassment claims from an arbitration agreement.
    • It remains to be seen whether courts will allow arbitration of related claims or claims with closely related facts to the sexual assault or harassment claims.
    • Individuals, such as employees, will be able to pursue their claims in court with a jury instead of a private arbitration that usually is not part of a public record. There are many considerations when facing a jury trial, rather than a private arbitration, and businesses should follow developments on this issue closely.

    Practices

    Labor & EmploymentCalifornia Labor & EmploymentLabor & Employment LitigationWorkplace: Policies, Procedures & TrainingWorkplace Violence Prevention & Response

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      California Supreme Court characterizes break “premiums” as wages

      June 2, 2022
    • Alert

      NYC Council passes bill amending pay transparency law

      May 12, 2022
    • Alert

      Badgerow v. Walters—SCOTUS issues a technical arbitration decision with practical consequences

      April 8, 2022

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL