Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. On second thought: Post abandons deal after rare FTC challengeAlerts

    Alert / Antitrust Alert

    On second thought: Post abandons deal after rare FTC challenge

    Jan 21, 2020

    Share

    By Brian Whittaker and Gordon Lang

    Post Holdings, Inc. announced that it was abandoning its acquisition of the private label cereal business of TreeHouse Foods, Inc. The chronology of the now-defunct deal is interesting and unusual, and as a result, parties to a deal that could raise competitive issues should have a strategy and be prepared in advance to address a government challenge based on potential competitive issues. This alert discusses what businesses need to know.

    DOWNLOADS

    On January 13, 2020, Post Holdings, Inc. (Post) announced that it was abandoning its acquisition of the private label cereal business of TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (TreeHouse).[1] The chronology of the now-defunct deal is interesting and unusual:

    • On May 2, 2019, Post announced that that it had agreed to acquire TreeHouse’s ready-to-eat cereal business.
    • After Post and TreeHouse completed filings to comply with the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR Act), “early termination” (termination of the applicable HSR waiting period before its end) was granted on May 17, 2019.
    • On July 22, 2019, the companies disclosed that closing of the deal was delayed because the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was reviewing the deal in detail.[2]
    • The FTC filed a complaint challenging the deal on December 19, 2019, claiming that it “would give Post more than a 60 percent share of an already highly concentrated market and eliminate the vigorous competition between them to serve grocers across the country.”[3]
    • Post initially denied the allegations in a response filed on January 3, 2020, but the companies abandoned the deal on January 13, 2020.

    The substance of the FTC’s complaint—alleging that the deal would further limit competition in an already concentrated market—appears to be fairly typical. However, it is unusual for the FTC to challenge a deal after it clears the HSR process without objection or a request for additional information. Such a challenge is even more unusual after early termination is granted, as occurred in this case.

    The HSR Act was designed in part to give the government an opportunity to review, and potentially challenge, proposed deals before consummation, and early termination is typically only granted when a deal does not raise any antitrust concerns. Indeed, the FTC’s website states that “a request for ‘early termination’ will be granted only after compliance with the rules and if both the [FTC] and Department of Justice Antitrust Division have completed their review and determined they will not take any enforcement action during the waiting period.”[4]

    Nevertheless, the experience of Post and TreeHouse provides a reminder that the expiration of the HSR waiting period, or a grant of early termination, does not constitute government “approval” of a deal. After HSR clearance, parties to a deal are free to proceed with the closing without violating the HSR Act, and HSR clearance will typically be sufficient to give parties comfort that their deal will not be challenged by the government. But transactions may still be, and occasionally are, challenged by the government after HSR clearance (even after closing).

    As a result, parties to a deal that could raise competitive issues should have a strategy and be prepared in advance to address a government challenge based on potential competitive issues, even if the deal clears the HSR waiting period or is granted early termination.


    1. “Post Holdings Terminates Agreement to Buy Ready-to-Eat Cereal Business from TreeHouse Foods, Inc.” (Jan. 13, 2020), available here.
      [Back to reference]
    2. “Post Holdings and TreeHouse Foods Provide Update on Proposed Private Label Ready-to-Eat Cereal Transaction” (Jul. 22, 2019), available here.
      [Back to reference]
    3. Press Release, “FTC Alleges Post Holdings, Inc.’s Proposed Acquisition of TreeHouse Foods, Inc.’s Private Label Ready-to-Eat Cereal Business Will Harm Competition” (Dec. 19, 2019), available here.
      [Back to reference]
    4. “About Early Termination Notices,” available here (emphasis added).
      [Back to reference]

    Practices

    LitigationAntitrust

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      Update Statute of Limitations suspended for additional period in New York

      May 18, 2020
    • Alert

      Supreme Court at the Illinois Brick wall: iPhone App Store customers can sue Apple for violation of federal antitrust law

      May 14, 2019
    • Alert

      Evaluating the efficacy and future of ACPERA

      April 19, 2019

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL