Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. Class-action lawsuit by DFS users against MLB may signal what’s on deckAlerts

    Alert / Gaming Law Alert

    Class-action lawsuit by DFS users against MLB may signal what’s on deck

    Jan 24, 2020

    Share

    By Christopher Queenin, Brian Kelly and Matthew McLaughlin

    Daily fantasy sports user files class-action lawsuit in an attempt to cash in on controversy—what does this signal to sports leagues affiliated with the budding sports betting industry?

    A class-action complaint filed in federal court in New York yesterday against Major League Baseball, the Houston Astros, and the Boston Red Sox related to daily fantasy sports (DFS) may be an indication of how plaintiffs’ lawyers will try to bring “sports betting” claims following on-the-field controversies and scandals.

    The complaint in Kristopher R. Olson v. Major League Baseball, et al. seeks monetary damages from MLB and the teams on behalf of DFS users who participated in MLB DFS contests when the teams were allegedly involved in electronic sign-stealing, which is not permitted under MLB’s rules. The primary claim is that the defendants violated numerous states’ consumer protection laws.

    In DFS contests, which most states expressly define as a game of skill that is not gambling, users compete against one another by building a roster of professional athletes and earning points based on the actual statistical performance of those athletes. The complaint alleges that “[b]ecause electronic sign stealing directly affects player performance statistics, teams and players that violate MLB’s prohibition directly compromise the fairness and integrity” of DFS contests. According to the complaint, MLB was aware of the sign-stealing while it was happening and did not take reasonable steps to stop or disclose the rule violations, and had plaintiff known about the sign-stealing, plaintiff would not have participated in the MLB DFS contests.

    The DFS users, however, appear to lack privity, and had no significant contact or relationship with MLB or any team. The plaintiff tries to address this issue by asserting that MLB invested in and was a “partner” with the DFS operator and marketed its services. Because of this purported arrangement, according to the complaint, MLB and its constituent teams had a financial stake in DFS competitions. However, most state consumer protection statutes—including Massachusetts, where the named plaintiff resides—require that the plaintiff and defendant be engaged in more than some minor or insignificant business relationship. Here, the relationship between the DFS users and the league appears tenuous at best.

    This complaint is likely a preview of the types of lawsuits that will come as sports betting proliferates across the country and as sports leagues affiliate with sports betting operators. Just this week, the NBA named theScore as the authorized sports betting operator of the NBA, which means theScore will gain access to official NBA statistical data. When the next sports controversy erupts—whether it be a scandal based on cheating, a significant blown call, or match fixing—opportunistic plaintiffs who placed bets will likely point to these types of business arrangements as a basis of recovery against the leagues and teams.

    Practices

    LitigationClass Actions & Aggregate Litigation

    Industries

    Esports & Gaming

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      Update Statute of Limitations suspended for additional period in New York

      May 18, 2020
    • Alert

      Yet another thing to worry about: The evolving law of standing in state courts when federal standing is lacking

      April 13, 2020

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL