Skip to main content

Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About
Trending Topics
    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor, Employment, and Benefits
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations
    Industries

    View All

    • Aviation
    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Nonprofit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Sports & Stadiums
    • Technology
    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

      We help clients create positive return on investments in people, products, and the planet.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    • Women in Dealmaking

      We provide strategic counsel on complex corporate transactions and unite dynamic women in the dealmaking arena.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. Battle of the Brooklyn-based indie band and diamond and platinum certified artists Kendrick Lamar and The Weeknd: Is it necessary to prove “access” under copyright law in an era of streaming?

      Alerts

    Alert / Litigation & Copyrights

    Battle of the Brooklyn-based indie band and diamond and platinum certified artists Kendrick Lamar and The Weeknd: Is it necessary to prove “access” under copyright law in an era of streaming?

    March 2, 2020

    LinkedInX (Twitter)EmailCopy URL

    A new lawsuit against The Weeknd and Kendrick Lamar highlights the complex issue of proving “access” in copyright infringement cases.

    In the lawsuit, filed this week in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the Brooklyn-based rock band known as Yeasayer sued Kendrick Lamar and The Weeknd, alleging that their Black Panther soundtrack song “Pray for Me” infringed Yeasayer’s copyright in the song “Sunrise” from their album All Hour Cymbals. “Pray for Me” peaked at No. 7 on the Billboard Hot 100 after its release in 2018, while Yeasayer disbanded on December 19, 2019.

    (The band formerly known as) Yeasayer alleges that Kendrick Lamar and The Weeknd, among other things, “extracted Plaintiffs’ choral performance” from “Sunrise,” altered its pitch, and then inserted the resulting material into “Pray for Me.” Further, the lawsuit alleges that the defendants violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act by intentionally removing the Content Management Information attached to the “Sunrise” cut to hide the infringement.

    Of course, if the case proceeds, one might imagine that there will be a duel of expert musicologists on all sides regarding whether there is substantial similarity between the tracks, and readers of this article should listen to both songs carefully to play along at home. However, one of the more complex legal issues in the case is likely to be one of “access.”

    Generally, in copyright infringement cases, absent evidence of direct copying, “proof of infringement” involves fact-based showings that the defendant had “access” to the plaintiff’s work and that the two works are “substantially similar.”

    In order to establish “access” a plaintiff must show that the defendant had a “reasonable” opportunity to view or copy the plaintiff’s work. Access can be established by way of circumstantial evidence. A court will consider either: (1) a particular chain of events that establishes a link between the plaintiff’s work and the defendant’s access (e.g., dealings with a movie studio or record label), or (2) that the plaintiff’s work has been widely disseminated.

    In the case against Lamar and The Weeknd, the plaintiffs have alleged that “access” will be established under the “widely disseminated” test because the All Hour Cymbals album and the “Sunrise” track were “widely distributed on CD and vinyl” and available for streaming. Plaintiffs do not allege anything in their complaint regarding the commercial success of either the ‘Sunrise” track or the All Hour Cymbals album.

    Although the defendants have not yet responded to the complaint and no discovery appears to have been conducted in the case, one might imagine that the defendants will argue that plaintiffs cannot establish access because there was an 11-year gap between the release of the tracks, and that the “Sunrise” cut was relatively obscure and was not “widely disseminated.”

    However, a jury recently determined that Katy Perry, her collaborators, and her record label must pay $2.78 million because her hit “Dark Horse” copied a Christian rap song. There, by showing Perry and her writers had ample opportunity to hear the Christian rap song, access was established.

    If the court reaches the issue here, then one of the more pressing issues in copyright jurisprudence may be further developed: What does “access” truly mean where innumerable artists, whether well-known or not, stream their music? In 2019, the total number of on-demand audio and video music streams in the United States was 1.15 trillion.  Therefore, is “access” assumed as long as a track is available online?  Is “access” the same as an opportunity to hear a song?  If so, does the Court still need to even examine the issue?

    It will be interesting to see what happens in this battle of the bands and whether copyright law is due for another evolution in the streaming era.

    Locations

    New York City

    Practices

    Intellectual PropertyLitigationEntertainment & Media

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      Update Statute of Limitations suspended for additional period in New York

      May 18, 2020
    • Alert

      Social media companies have a boring but effective weapon in defeating copyright claims — well-drafted “terms of use” agreements

      April 22, 2020
    • Alert

      Top Dawgs: Are “reputational damages” available in copyright cases?

      March 30, 2020
    The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Purchase Order Terms & Conditions
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL
    © 2025 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved