Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. ARRC-proposed New York LIBOR Legislation: The Trustees’ perspective Alerts

    Alert / Corporate Trust Alert

    ARRC-proposed New York LIBOR Legislation: The Trustees’ perspective

    July 6, 2020

    Share

    By Robert Coughlin

    We have received a number of questions from our Corporate Trust clients about the New York State legislation proposed by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) addressing LIBOR transition for existing contracts and how it would affect trustees, if adopted. Here’s the skinny.

    In a nutshell, trustees would benefit from the adoption of this legislation, which is designed to minimize or eliminate certain legal uncertainties and possible adverse consequences associated with LIBOR transition. But don't count on it happening!

    Arguably the biggest challenges associated with LIBOR transition will be faced by transactions that contain (i) LIBOR fallback terms limited to some form of “polling” procedure (e.g., telephone calls to some number of London reference banks to request quotes, and failing receipt of some minimal number of quotes from which an average can be taken,  doing the same with some number of New York banks) and/or a “last LIBOR” provision (e.g., terms fixing the index rate at whatever rate applied on the last date LIBOR was available), or (ii) no LIBOR fallback terms at all.

    The prevalent view in the market is that “polling” procedures will be unsuccessful; there is growing consternation over the prospect of “last LIBOR” terms causing variable rates to become fixed; and any transaction completely lacking any LIBOR fallback faces an obvious dilemma come the end of December 2021. These challenges are exacerbated by the requirement in most transaction documents (other than those containing some version of the ARRC-recommended amendment terms) that any change to the interest rate requires the consent of each holder affected. As a result, an amendment to adopt a replacement rate might be an option for some transactions but it is unlikely to be viable for most, absent some incentive that brings all parties to the table.

    The New York legislation proposed by ARRC, were it to be adopted, would specifically address these issues and avoid resorting to judicial remedy or litigation. For example, the legislation would:

    • Nullify “polling” provisions and override “last LIBOR” terms, where they would take effect in the absence of some other effective fallback; and
    • Where a transaction has no LIBOR fallback, automatically apply the ARRC-recommended SOFR rate and ARRC-recommended spread adjustment as the fallback to LIBOR.

      The proposed legislation would also provide relief to trustees in another situation, namely one in which transaction documents call upon the trustee to determine, or participate in the determination of, a replacement rate. The legislation provides that:

    • Any transaction party having responsibility for determining or selecting a replacement for LIBOR (a “Determining Party”) will have the benefit of a safe harbor from liability or litigation if it elects to adopt the ARRC-recommended benchmark replacement within a designated period of time; and
    • Provides that the ARRC-recommended benchmark replacement will, as a matter of law, constitute a “commercially reasonable substitute for and a commercially substantially equivalent to” LIBOR, and a “reasonable, comparable or analogous term for” LIBOR, and its use will constitute “substantial performance” by any person of “any right or obligation under or in respect of” the relevant transaction concerning LIBOR.

    At the same time, the proposed legislation would not affect or override any transaction that otherwise has effective fallback terms (other than “polling” or “last LIBOR” or other formulation that depends on LIBOR). For example, one having a fallback to a prime rate or federal funds rate would not be affected. And, the legislation does not preclude a Determining Party from selecting a replacement rate other than the ARRC-recommended benchmark replacement (e.g., SOFR), or bar the adoption of any cap, floor, modifier, or spread adjustment; it simply would not provide a safe harbor if those are chosen.

    On the other hand, if for any reason parties to a given transaction do not want the mandatory aspects of the legislation to apply (such as, for example, those who may be agreeable to the application of “last LIBOR” terms in their deal documents), the legislation allows parties to opt-out of its mandatory terms (by written agreement of all requisite parties that, retrospectively or prospectively, the applicable contract, security, or instrument shall not be subject to the legislation). And, as noted above, there is nothing in the legislation that would preclude transaction parties from otherwise entering into an amendment in accordance with the terms of their documents to address LIBOR transition, as long as the amendment does not adopt fallback based in any way on LIBOR.

    However, the bad news is, don’t count on it. The legislation has not been introduced and the 2020 New York legislative session has ended. The earliest it could be introduced would be January 2021. Whether that happens and, if so, what its chances for adoption might be, remains to be seen.

    Locations

    AlbanyLong IslandNew York CityRochester

    Practices

    Corporate & FinanceCorporate Trust

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      Kirschner v. JPMorgan — A welcome decision for administrative agents and the syndicated loan and CLO markets

      July 9, 2020
    • Alert

      TALF and the CLO market: Not the market fix-all parties may hope for

      July 8, 2020
    • Alert

      New proposed IRS regulations for transitions from the use of LIBOR to other interbank offering rates

      Oct 30, 2019

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL