Skip to main content

Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About
Trending Topics
    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor, Employment, and Benefits
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations
    Industries

    View All

    • Aviation
    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Nonprofit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Sports & Stadiums
    • Technology
    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

      We help clients create positive return on investments in people, products, and the planet.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    • Women in Dealmaking

      We provide strategic counsel on complex corporate transactions and unite dynamic women in the dealmaking arena.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. Understanding global grace periods to avoid missing patent opportunities

      Alerts

    Alert / Intellectual Property

    Understanding global grace periods to avoid missing patent opportunities

    Sep 29, 2021

    LinkedInX (Twitter)EmailCopy URL

    By Matthew Kitces and Angelo Christopher

    Inventors and patent applicants should consider the grace periods available in many jurisdictions when making strategic decisions about whether and where to seek patent protection.

    What’s the Impact?

    • The US provides a one-year grace period for certain inventor-related disclosures; a number of other countries and regions also provide similar six-month or one-year grace periods
    • Many other jurisdictions also provide for grace periods, albeit under more limited circumstances
    • Familiarity with requirements surrounding grace periods in various jurisdictions can be useful and important when building a patent portfolio

    DOWNLOAD

    Grace periods and patent protection (PDF)

    Ideally, inventors will not publicly disclose their invention until they have filed a patent application, but this approach is not always practical. Certain jurisdictions, including the United States, provide grace periods that allow an applicant to obtain patent protection even after the invention has been publicly disclosed. The scope and duration of these grace periods varies across jurisdictions, and it is important to consider a jurisdiction’s grace period (or lack thereof) when making strategic decisions about where and when to seek patent protection.

    Invention disclosure before patent application filing

    When a patent application is examined, the invention will be compared to the “prior art” to determine whether the invention is new and inventive. This prior art can include patents, publications, and products, among other things. In fact, the inventor’s prior work (e.g., published papers, offers to sell the invention, presentations) could potentially be prior art, too.

    To ensure effective protection for an invention, patent professionals strongly recommend filling for a patent to minimise exposure to prior art. Ideally, the patent application will be filed before the inventor publicly discloses (e.g., publishes, presents, or sells) the invention.

    However, at least some jurisdictions (including the United States) allow the inventor to publicly disclose the invention for a limited period of time before filing for patent protection without creating disqualifying prior art, if certain conditions are met. Several countries afford these so-called “grace periods.” The scope and duration of these grace periods depends on the jurisdiction.

    The American Specifications

    The America Invents Act (AIA) provides a one-year grace period for disclosures by an inventor. This grace period applies if:

    • the disclosure was made by the inventor or joint inventor or by another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor; or
    • the subject matter disclosed had, before such disclosure, been publicly disclosed by the inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor.[1]

    For example, if an inventor discloses their invention at a trade show before filing a patent application, that disclosure will not qualify as prior art in the US so long as the inventor effectively files a patent application within the one-year grace period.

    The AIA grace period provisions also eliminate certain disclosures by others from being considered prior art. In the above example, sales of the invention by a third party after the trade show but before the inventor files the patent application within the one-year grace period, would also not be considered prior art in the US.

    Grace periods in foreign jurisdictions

    The rules regarding grace periods for patent protection vary among different countries or regions patent offices. For example, many offer no grace period at all, while others offer grace periods for inventor-originated disclosures, similar to the US.

    Some jurisdictions have narrow grace periods that only apply to disclosures at certain recognized exhibits or disclosures resulting from an abuse of relation (e.g., a breach of contract). As discussed above, many applicants choose to share their invention with others but maintain secrecy using non-disclosure agreements (NDA). Generally, if someone breaches the NDA and publicly discloses the invention before a patent application is filed, such a disclosure would be disqualified as prior art.

    Examples of countries with grace periods based on inventor-originated disclosures include:

    • Australia (12-month)
    • Canada (12-month)
    • Eurasian Patent Organization (6-month)
    • Mexico (12-month)
    • Republic of Korea (12-month)
    • Russian Federation (6-month)
    • United States (12-month, as described above)

    Examples of countries with narrower grace periods based on abuses of relation (e.g., breach of contract) and/or disclosures at certain official exhibitions include:

    • Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (12-month for abusive actions against applicant; 6-month for official exhibitions)
    • European Patent Office (6-month)
    • Saudi Arabia (6-month for arbitrary acts against applicant; 12-month for official exhibitions)
    • Spain (6-month)
    • Sweden (6-month)
    • Switzerland (6-month)
    • United Kingdom (6-month)

    These lists are not exhaustive, additional requirements may need to be met for various jurisdictions, and these grace periods may change over time.

    Looking ahead

    Knowledge that different types of grace periods exist in different countries can be important when building a patent portfolio, especially when public disclosures or other events have occurred or may occur that might otherwise result in problematic prior art against a later-filed patent application. Even if a grace period is unavailable, a disclosure may not preclude the ability to obtain a patent if the disclosure does not contain sufficient detail to enable a person skilled in the art to make or use the invention.

    Finally, since the rules and requirements surrounding grace periods in various countries can change over time, it is always recommended to consult with your patent counsel when considering patent filings for an invention that has already been disclosed.


    1. 35 U.S.C. §102(b)(1)(A)-(B).
      [Back to reference]

    Practices

    Intellectual Property

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      Updated—European Patent System: What’s different for 2023?

      Sep 13, 2022
    • Press Release

      Nixon Peabody secures enforcement of patent infringement settlement term sheet for Ulta-Lit Tree Company

      July 20, 2022
    • Alert

      Subject matter eligibility considerations can now be deferred under new USPTO pilot program

      Jan 19, 2022
    The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Purchase Order Terms & Conditions
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL
    © 2025 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved