Skip to main content

Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About
Trending Topics
    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor, Employment, and Benefits
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations
    Industries

    View All

    • Aviation
    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Nonprofit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Sports & Stadiums
    • Technology
    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

      We help clients create positive return on investments in people, products, and the planet.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    • Women in Dealmaking

      We provide strategic counsel on complex corporate transactions and unite dynamic women in the dealmaking arena.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. Child Victims Act Plaintiffs precluded from filing lapsed federal abuse claims

      Alerts

    Alert / Education

    Child Victims Act Plaintiffs precluded from filing lapsed federal abuse claims

    Aug 23, 2023

    LinkedInX (Twitter)EmailCopy URL

    By Tina Sciocchetti

    The Second Circuit has ruled that New York’s Child Victims Act does not revive or toll time-barred Title IX and Section 1983 claims.

    What’s the impact?

    • Five federal appellate courts, including the Second, Fifth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits, have now held that specialized states statutes for sexual abuse claims do not revive otherwise untimely Section 1983 or Title IX claims.
    • Plaintiffs suing educational institutions and personnel related to alleged historical sexual abuse under state revival statutes like the Child Victims Act face increasing difficulty in establishing federal court jurisdiction.
    • The decisions do not impact a plaintiff’s ability to attempt to revive time barred state claims related to alleged child sexual abuse, in state court.

    DOWNLOAD

    PDF: Read about the Child Victims Act Plaintiffs ruling

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (covering New York, Connecticut, and Vermont) held last week that New York’s Child Victims Act (CVA) — which, in part, revived the time within which survivors of child sexual abuse could file state civil suits related to their abuse— did not revive or toll potential federal claims based on the same abusive conduct under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. (Title IX) or 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Section 1983). In ruling that the CVA has no impact on the limitations period for Title IX and Section 1983 claims, the Second Circuit joined every other federal Circuit Court of Appeals that has addressed the issue to date, ruling that “a specialized statute for sexual abuse claims does not render an otherwise untimely Section 1983 or Title IX claim timely.”[1]

    The court consolidated for disposition the appeals in two different cases presenting the same claims revival issue. In one, the plaintiff sued his former school district, several former district employees, and one of his alleged abusers, for claims related to bullying and assaultive conduct against him during his freshman-year high school football season. The plaintiff alleged he was physically assaulted and sexually abused by older players, that coaches observed some of the incidents and failed to intervene, and that the head coach and school officials botched their responses to his complaints of abuse. The other plaintiff sued her former school district, her girls’ basketball coach, and several administrators, asserting claims stemming from the coach’s alleged sexual abuse of her while she was a minor student. Both plaintiffs sued in federal district court, asserting state claims that had been revived under the CVA, as well as federal claims under Title IX. The latter plaintiff included a Section 1983 claim. In both cases, the statute of limitations for the federal claims had long expired.[2]

    The plaintiffs argued that Section 214-g of the CVA, which provides a one-time, look-back period during which plaintiffs may commence civil actions based upon certain conduct which would constitute sexual offenses committed against children less than 18 years of age, acted to revive their federal claims.  Both district courts disagreed and held that even though the federal Title IX and Section 1983 claims were based on sexual abuse that fell within the contours of the Section 214-g, that law did not revive or toll the related federal claims. The district courts declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims, effectively leaving state court as the plaintiffs’ sole venue. The Second Circuit affirmed, holding that the tort-specific tolling provision found in the CVA is “not a revival or tolling statute closely related to the residual personal injury statute of limitations applicable to a Section 1983 or Title IX claim” and therefore did not affect the timeliness of the plaintiffs’ Title IX and Section 1983 claims, which were time barred.

    With increasing numbers of states passing legislation that revives, for specified time periods, untimely child sexual abuse claims, federal appellate courts are thus far uniform in holding that these statutes have no impact on lapsed Title IX and Section 1983 claims. These decisions make it increasingly difficult for plaintiffs to pursue federal court actions related to alleged historical child sexual abuse against educational institutions and personnel. We will continue to monitor and report on CVA and Title IX developments impacting educational institutions.


    1. See Varnell v. Dora Consol. Sch. Dist., 756 F.3d 1208, 1212–13 (10th Cir. 2014); Bonneau v. Centennial Sch. Dist. No. 28J, 666 F.3d 577, 580 (9th Cir. 2012); King-White v. Humble Indep. Sch. Dist., 803 F.3d 754, 759–61 (5th Cir. 2015); Woods v. Ill. Dep’t of Child. and Fam. Servs., 710 F.3d 762, 765–68 (7th Cir. 2013). The Second Circuit noted that New York state courts interpreting the same statute of limitations provisions reached the same result, citing Dolgas v. Wales, 215 A.D.3d 51 (3d Dep’t 2023) and BL Doe 3 v. Female Acad. of the Sacred Heart, 199 A.D.3d 1419 (4th Dep’t 2021).
      [back to reference ]
    2. Under well-settled law, claims filed in New York federal courts under Title IX and Section 1983 (both lacking a statute of limitations) are governed by New York’s general statute of limitations for personal injury actions, which is three years under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5).
      [back to reference ]

    Industries

    Higher Education

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      Title IX complaint against University of Oregon features NIL arguments

      Dec 12, 2023
    • Alert

      With borrower defense claims on the rise, how should schools respond?

      Nov 2, 2023
    • Alert

      Recent executive order prioritizes domestic innovation and manufacturing

      Aug 21, 2023
    The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Purchase Order Terms & Conditions
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL
    © 2025 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved