Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Articles
    4. Apple makes big claims on data privacy: But is what’s good for the goose good for the gander?Articles

    Article

    Apple makes big claims on data privacy: But is what’s good for the goose good for the gander?

    Feb 11, 2021

    Share
    On International Data Privacy Day, Apple published a plain-spoken user guide to data privacy, calling for the creation of international data standards and reforms, and taking aim at data failures across the tech industry.

    Every year on January 28, public interest organizations, educational institutions, and other entities around the world celebrate International Data Privacy Day. For most private companies, the day is an opportunity to emphasize their data privacy strengths, announce new initiatives, and look forward to the future. But this year, Apple went a step further, publishing a plain-spoken user guide to data privacy, calling for the creation of international data standards and reforms, and taking aim at data failures across the tech industry.

    The centerpiece of Apple’s Data Privacy Day announcements was its publication of A Day in the Life of Your Data, a guide intended to inform Apple customers about how they generate data, how that data is captured, and how it is sold to advertisers and other companies. Through the example of a father merely taking his daughter to the park and to buy ice cream, Apple discussed how location data tracking, targeted multi-platform advertising, photo harvesting, and information about credit card spending can be used to create a comprehensive user profile—showing where someone lives and travels, who they know, their income bracket, etc.—that can then be packaged and sold with either no (or passive) consent.

    Along with the guide, Apple announced new changes to its app store, mandating that any app listed on the store ask for user permission before tracking data across apps or websites owned by other companies. Apple also publicized changes to how apps are listed on the store, including the creation of a “privacy nutrition label”—a standardized guide that shows how each listed app engages in data collection, data sharing, and operation of its own privacy practices. Apple also advertised how users of Apple products can exercise greater control over their data by utilizing proprietary data features, including the ability to disable third-party data tracking.

    Many see these announcements as not just good PR for Apple; they are a new front in a larger conflict with Facebook over the future of data usage. By giving users the ability to limit third-party data tracking, Apple directly threatens the main moneymaker for Facebook’s operations—the sale of micro-targeted advertising based on data collected from the 2.8 billion users Facebook serves each month. Press reports state that Facebook may be considering an anti-trust suit against Apple, whose dominance in the device and application sales market dwarfs all other competitors, and whose data privacy practices are sure to influence the industry at large.

    The conflict between Apple and Facebook is, in many ways, two sides of the same coin. Apple’s new security features, while admirable on paper, will likely only decrease the sale of sensitive user data to third-parties from Apple devices; from all indications, Apple plans to continue to gather such information for itself. And this seems to be where the rubber meets the road in the conflict between Apple, Facebook, and other tech companies; Apple holds itself out as a paragon of privacy virtue—and can rely on its formidable device and hardware sales for financial might—whereas Facebook, who relies on data sales to survive, believes that Apple just wants to dominate the user data market for itself. In a struggle for data control between the world’s largest corporate Goliath and nearly everyone else in the tech sector, it will be interesting to see who ends up on top in this dispute. Stay tuned.

    PrivacyPrivacy

    Practices

    Cybersecurity & Privacy

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL