Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Articles
    4. Federal court rules CDC eviction moratorium unconstitutionalArticles

    Article

    Federal court rules CDC eviction moratorium unconstitutional

    Feb 26, 2021

    Share

    By Harry Kelly

    A U.S. district court judge in Texas issued an opinion holding that the CDC eviction moratorium, which was recently extended to March 31, 2021, is unconstitutional.

    On Thursday, February 25, 2021, a U.S. district court judge in Texas issued an opinion holding that the eviction moratorium issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which was recently extended to March 31, 2021, is unconstitutional. Terkel v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Case No, 6:20-cv-00564 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 25, 2021)(slip op.). As you may recall, the CARES Act imposed a federal-level eviction moratorium that continued in effect until July 2020. After the lapse of the original CARES Act moratorium, the CDC issued a follow-up eviction moratorium on the grounds that evictions would lead to families moving into shelter housing or co-habitating with other families, which would tend to spread the virus, and that it could impose an eviction moratorium under its authority to prevent the spread of communicable diseases across state lines. 85 Fed. Reg. 55292 (Sept. 4, 2020). The most-recent COVID-19 relief bill extended that moratorium to December 31, 2020, and the CDC recently further extended the moratorium to March 31, 2021.

    Not so fast, said the Texas judge. While acknowledging that eviction moratoriums may be lawful as part of state laws managing eviction procedures generally and under states’ broad “police powers” to promote “the lives, health, morals, comfort and general welfare” of their citizens, slip op. at 1 (citations omitted), these eviction moratoriums reflect a significant expansion of federal power:

    The federal government cannot say that it has ever before invoked its power over interstate commerce to impose a residential eviction moratorium. It did not do so during the deadly Spanish Flu pandemic. Nor did it invoke such a power during the exigencies of the Great Depression. The federal government has not claimed such a power at any point during our Nation's history until last year. Slip op. at 2 (citations omitted).

    The court engaged in a detail analysis of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause to regulate interstate commerce, as well as other constitutional provisions, and concluded that the moratoriums exceeded the government’s authority.

    The broad scope of the opinion suggests that any federal eviction moratorium is unlikely to pass muster under the Commerce Clause, in part because the decision to evict a tenant is not, in the court’s view, an “economic” act within Congress’s power to regulate. An argument could be made that the Texas judge gave short shrift to the other grounds cited in support of the CDC moratorium — for example, that a massive wave of evictions could drive up infections and result in further destabilizing of the economy. Possibly, with additional factual findings about the economic impact of a wave of evictions, Congress could provide sufficient evidence to meet even the tough standards that the Terkel decision imposes.

    The judge wrote that “‘it is anticipated that [defendants] would respect the declaratory judgment,’” but left open the possibility of imposing an injunction if they do not. Slip. op. at 20 (citations omitted). It will be interesting to see whether, in the new COVID-19 relief bill under consideration, Congress adds language to provide additional support for federal eviction moratoriums in the future.

    Affordable HousingCoronavirus

    Practices

    Affordable Housing

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL