Skip to main content

Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About
Trending Topics
    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor, Employment, and Benefits
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations
    Industries

    View All

    • Aviation
    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Nonprofit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Sports & Stadiums
    • Technology
    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

      We help clients create positive return on investments in people, products, and the planet.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    • Women in Dealmaking

      We provide strategic counsel on complex corporate transactions and unite dynamic women in the dealmaking arena.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Articles
    4. Eighth Circuit rejects attempt to terminate wind PPAs over upstream ownership change

      Articles

    Article

    Eighth Circuit rejects attempt to terminate wind PPAs over upstream ownership change

    Aug 30, 2021

    LinkedInX (Twitter)EmailCopy URL

    By Elizabeth Whittle

    Last week, the Eighth Circuit rejected an attempt to terminate PPAs based upon a change in ownership upstream of the wind project companies.

    Last week, the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a lower court’s order that prevented a utility offtaker from terminating four wind PPAs based upon a finding that the separate wind project companies did not transfer a majority of their “direct ownership interests” without the consent of the utility offtaker when the parent of the project companies was transferred.

    Each PPA at issue contained an identical provision that prohibited the project company from entering into a transaction that resulted in a “Change Control” without the utility offtaker’s consent. The PPAs defined “Change Control” as “the sale or transfer after the Effective Date of a majority of the direct ownership interest” in the project company. Following the sale of a parent company of the project companies, the utility offtaker served notice of termination on the project companies asserting that the recent sale of the parent company along with a 2012 transfer of a parent company out of a bankruptcy proceeding were done without the utility offtaker’s consent and resulted in a change of the project companies’ “direct ownership interests.” The utility offtaker thus argued that the project companies had breached their PPAs. In response, the project companies sued the utility offtaker seeking a declaration that they had not breached the change-of-control provision and an injunction preventing the utility offtaker from terminating the PPAs, both of which were granted by the lower court.

    The Eighth Circuit, after first finding that that the term “direct ownership interests” was unambiguous, found that the only reasonable interpretation of the term was to mean ownership of membership units in the limited liability project companies. Although the court agreed that a parent company asserts a degree of control over its subsidiaries, it stated that “ownership of intermediate corporate entities is not direct ownership.” The court explained that direct ownership interest means ownership interest of the project companies themselves and not the “indirect ownership interest” of the parent company. Because neither the sale of the parent company nor its transfer pursuant to the 2012 bankruptcy case—both of which the court noted were “upstream of the [project companies] by many tiers of intermediate ownership”—involved the transfer of the project companies’ direct ownership interests, the court concluded that the project companies had not breached the terms of their respective PPAs.

    The Eighth Circuit also rejected arguments made by the utility offtaker that the project companies had violated the PPAs’ anti-assignment clauses by turning over certain day-to-day operations and management of the wind projects to a third party without the utility offtaker’s consent. The court found however, that the project companies had merely delegated (rather than assigned) the operation and management tasks and that the PPAs did not prohibit the delegation of duties. The PPAs only prohibited the assignment of obligations and there was no evidence in the record that the project companies had transferred any obligations arising under the PPAs. Rather the project companies remained “ultimately responsible for their promised contractual obligations,” and thus they had not violated the anti-assignment clauses.

    While the Eighth Circuit concluded here that the PPAs had not been breached, the case nevertheless highlights how important it is for developers, financing parties, and offtakers to carefully tailor PPA change-of-control and assignment provisions so that they are no broader than intended.

    Practices

    Project Finance

    Industries

    Renewable EnergyEnergy
    The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Purchase Order Terms & Conditions
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL
    © 2025 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved