June 30, 2020
We discuss yesterday’s announcement from the State Department to restrict the export of U.S.-origin defense equipment to Hong Kong and its goal to impose the same restrictions on exports of U.S. dual-use technologies to Hong Kong as they exist for China. Also, this morning the Commerce Department announced that it is suspending all License Exceptions for exports to Hong Kong, unless a License Exception could also be used for exports to China.
As a sign of the growing tension between the United States and China over the imposition by the Beijing government of a new security law on Hong Kong, the U.S. government on Monday, June 29, announced new restrictions banning the export of U.S.-origin defense equipment to Hong Kong and the desire to impose the same restrictions on U.S. dual-use technologies to Hong Kong as for China. Previously, on May 27, U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo communicated to Congress that the U.S. no longer considered Hong Kong as being autonomous from the People’s Republic of China and President Trump two days later announced he was, “directing my administration to begin the process of eliminating policy exemptions that give Hong Kong different and special treatment.”
Secretary Pompeo announced on June 29 that the administration would “end exports of U.S.-origin defense equipment and will take steps toward imposing the same restrictions on U.S. defense and dual-use technologies to Hong Kong as it does for China.” These restrictions include both defense articles that are on the U.S. Munitions List and dual-use products that the exporter knows will be used for military purposes. Imposing restrictions on the export of defense articles to Hong Kong will eventually require a change to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). As of this morning, the U.S. Department of State’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), which administers and enforces the ITAR, has not announced such a change, including in its country-specific guidance. However, such a change could come any time in the coming days. However, this morning, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), which administers the export, reexport, and transfer of dual use and commercial products, announced that effective June 30, 2020, it is suspending any License Exceptions for exports to Hong Kong, reexports to Hong Kong, and transfers (in-country) within Hong Kong of items subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), which provide differential treatment than those available to the People’s Republic of China. BIS explained that it is taking this action pursuant to Section 740.2(b) of the EAR, which provides that all License Exceptions are subject to revision, suspension, or revocation, in whole or in part, without notice. Additionally, in the coming months BIS will likely work on changing actual provisions in the EAR pertaining to its licensing policy regarding Hong Kong, reasons for control, and related changes to eventually treat exports, reexports, and transfers to and within Hong Kong as if they were destined to China.
Separate but relatedly, U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced that his department would suspend “regulations affording preferential treatment to Hong Kong over China, including the availability of export license exceptions.” Exporters of sensitive technology products will likely be required to undergo a rigorous application process to receive a license to export these items to Hong Kong.
Nixon Peabody advises clients on all aspects of export compliance, including U.S. export controls on China and can provide additional details on the existing and announced restrictions. We will continue to monitor these developments and provide further analysis as warranted.
The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.