Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. COVID-19’s impact on California workers’ compensation insurance exposureAlerts

    Alert / Employment Law Alert

    COVID-19’s impact on California workers’ compensation insurance exposure

    March 26, 2020

    Share

    By Daniel Sovocool

    As employers are facing the devastating effects of COVID-19, a question arises whether an employee who tests positive for COVID-19 and loses time at work due to illness may recover from his or her employer under California workers’ compensation law.

    As a preliminary matter, California workers’ compensation law applies to employees who are performing services regardless of whether they are working on-premises or remotely. This means that California workers’ compensation law applies to employees working from home under current state and local “shelter in place” orders. Assuming these workers maintain proper social distancing, they present relatively few concerns to the employer about compensable viral exposures.

    Of larger concern are employees who are continuing to work outside the home because they are employed by businesses that provide “essential services,” or because the employees cannot work remotely and are needed to provide minimum basic operations such as the necessary activities to maintain the value of the business’s inventory, ensure security, process payroll and employee benefits, or for related functions. These employees present the greatest risk of viral exposure claims.

    Generally speaking, most viral exposures faced at work are considered “nonindustrial” and are therefore not compensable under workers’ compensation law due to the difficulties associated with showing that the employee was exposed to the virus at work, instead of during his or her daily commute or other social interactions. However, there are two exceptions where an employee might be able to recover: (1) where the employment subjected the employee to an increased risk of contracting the disease, compared to the risk posed to the general public; or (2) if the disease is caused by an intervening human agency or instrumentality of employment. LaTourette v. W.C.A.B. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 644, 654.

    COVID-19 is far too new to have been the subject of any definitive guidance. However, we can look to California case law discussing other industrial diseases and exposures to guide us in navigating these waters.

    One relevant example, related to whether the employee was subjected to “increased risk,” is published law addressing the onset of “Valley Fever,” an infectious fungal disease, coccidiodomycosis. Valley Fever was a disease contracted by “inhaling fungal spores that [became] airborne after disturbance of contaminated soil by humans or natural disasters.” Id. at 1329. In some cases, these spores would travel far and wide as “[s]trong winds [could] carry spores of the Coccifungus for hundreds of kilometers. Therefore, in certain circumstances infection can be spread well outside of recognized endemic areas.” Id. Furthermore, “[a]bout 60 percent of the people infected are asymptomatic, their exposure to the infection being reflected only by a positive . . . skin test.” Id. at 1330. Therefore, where Valley Fever was considered endemic to a large portion of California, “‘the exact source (home, recreation, work, travel, etc.) of the exposure [could not] be determined absent scientific data, e.g., soils tests, confirming the existence of the Cocci fungus in the soil at issue at the time of exposure.’” Id. at 1336; see also Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Commission (1942) 19 Cal.2d 622, 628 (“It is, of course, a fundamental principle that the disease must be contracted in the course of the employment, and the burden of proof thereof rests upon the applicant”).

    If the employee is able to show that “the risk to which he was subjected by his employment was not the same as that of the public in the endemic area inasmuch as the great majority of the inhabitants there possessed an immunity.” Id. at 574. Therefore, we can envision situations where this could arise, especially for front line personnel in the health care field. Complicating matters is that, under the statewide “shelter in place” order, most of California’s workforce are working remotely or not working at all, making any workplace risk probably greater, in a relative sense, than what it would have been otherwise.

    For companies that have workforces still on-premises, we recommend using only the smallest number of employees necessary to provide the service, consistent with “essential services” restrictions, providing personal protective equipment, eliminating shared equipment, regularly disinfecting all surfaces, and creating at least six feet of space between workers. Anyone who is sick or exhibiting viral symptoms should be ordered to stay home. Additional measures may be necessary depending on the employment. All steps should be taken to document these protections.

    Locations

    Los AngelesSan Francisco

    Practices

    Labor & EmploymentCalifornia Labor & EmploymentLabor & Employment Litigation

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      How employers can prepare for expected waves of coronavirus (COVID-19) related litigation

      April 29, 2020
    • Alert

      Restarting safely: Construction under California’s shifting shelter-in-place orders

      April 24, 2020
    • Alert

      Don’t forget the FMLA: Large employers still face Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) obligations due to coronavirus (COVID-19)

      April 23, 2020

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL