Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. Legality of unlimited PTO policies addressed for the first time by California courtsAlerts

    Alert / Employment Law Alert

    Legality of unlimited PTO policies addressed for the first time by California courts

    April 30, 2020

    Share

    By Hillary Baca and Andrea Chavez

    Earlier this month, the California Court of Appeal in McPherson v. EF Intercultural Foundation, Inc.[1] issued the state’s first published opinion addressing the legality of unlimited paid-time-off (PTO) policies. This long-awaited decision provides important guidance to employers who have opted to provide employees with unlimited PTO.

    California state and federal law do not require employers to provide employees with PTO. When an employer does have a PTO policy, however, Labor Code Section 227.3 requires the employer to pay as wages any “vested” but unused vacation time upon termination. In recent years, unlimited PTO policies have gained popularity among California employers, who have largely operated on the assumption that Section 227.3 does not apply to such policies. The employers have reasoned that PTO does not vest under an unlimited policy, and as such, there was no “vested” time to payout upon termination. However, due to the lack of guidance on the issue, employers were largely operating with uncertainty, until this month. The McPherson decision is the first published decision to address the legality of unlimited PTO policies.

    The McPherson case

    In McPherson, the employees brought action against their former employer, claiming that it failed to pay them accrued but unused vacation wages upon termination. The employer claimed that its policy provided for unlimited PTO with no accruals, so there was nothing to pay upon termination.

    The Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s finding that, based on the particular set of facts, the employer’s “unlimited” PTO policy was subject to Section 227.3 because it was unwritten, was not unlimited in practice, and was never conveyed as unlimited to plaintiffs. The court noted that the employer’s PTO policy had an implied cap where the employer expected employees to take vacation in the range typically available to corporate employees (such as two to six weeks), and the employees’ work schedules precluded them from taking advantage of any purported “unlimited” policy.

    The Court of Appeal limited its holding to the facts of the case, stating that it does “not hold that [S]ection 227.3 necessarily applies to truly unlimited time-off policies.”[2]

    Providing further guidance, the court stated that an unlimited PTO policy might not trigger Section 227.3 if it:

    • Is in writing
    • Clearly provides that employees’ ability to take PTO is not a form of additional wages for services performed, but part of the employer’s promise to provide a flexible work schedule, including employees’ ability to decide when and how much time to take off
    • Spells out the rights and obligations of both the employees and the employer and the consequences of failing to schedule time off [3]
    • In practice, allows sufficient opportunity for employees to take time off, or work fewer hours in lieu of taking time off
    • Is administered fairly, so that it neither becomes a de facto “use-it-or-lose-it policy” nor results in inequities, such as where one employee works many hours, taking minimal time off, and another works fewer hours and takes more time off [4]

    Employer takeaways

    Although the above guidance is helpful, there are many open questions as to the lawfulness of unlimited PTO policies. Employers should contact an employment attorney to ensure their unlimited PTO policies are carefully drafted and, at a minimum, account for the guidance set forth in McPherson.


    1. McPherson v. EF Intercultural Foundation, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App., Apr. 1, 2020, No. B290869) 2020 WL 1543339. [Back to reference]
    2. Id. at 14. [Back to reference]
    3. While the court did not offer guidance as to this factor, presumably this would require the employer to explain that if the employee does not schedule time off, PTO will not vest and accrue. [Back to reference]
    4. Id. [Back to reference]

    Locations

    Los AngelesSan Francisco

    Practices

    Labor & EmploymentCalifornia Labor & EmploymentLabor & Employment Litigation

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      Get ready for 2021! A roundup of new California employment laws

      Nov 4, 2020
    • Alert

      California courts expand operations, many allow remote proceedings

      May 20, 2020

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL