Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. Jury sides with Hermès in MetaBirkins trademark infringement lawsuitAlerts

    Alert / Intellectual Property

    Jury sides with Hermès in MetaBirkins trademark infringement lawsuit

    Feb 10, 2023

    Share

    By April Hua, Erica Van Loon, Staci Trager (Riordan) and Farrah Usmani

    Intellectual Property law and digital media—Does your artwork tread on trademark rights?

    What’s the impact?

    • A New York jury found that Mason Rothschild’s “MetaBirkins” NFTs constituted trademark infringement and dilution and that the First Amendment did not bar Rothschild from liability.
    • The jury agreed with Hermès, finding that the NFTs were more appropriately viewed as commercial goods rather than art.
    • This decision clarifies the extent to which real-world trademark rights apply in the digital space, helping to fill an intellectual property quagmire left in the wake of NFTs and the metaverse.

    Summary of the MetaBirkins case

    In January 2022, Hermès filed a trademark infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of New York against artist Mason Rothschild, who had released a collection of 100 MetaBirkins NFTs in November of the previous year. The MetaBirkins replicated Hermès’ iconic Birkin bag shape but added fur, patterns, artwork, and other digital flourishes. Rothschild also registered and used the domain name www.metabirkin.com and promoted the NFTs through the Instagram account @metabirkins. Under these facts, Hermès argued that Rothschild’s sale of MetaBirkins likely caused consumer confusion, the touchstone of trademark law, because consumers likely mistakenly believed that Hermès and MetaBirkins were affiliated.

    In response, Rothschild asserted that the Rogers test applied, which provides an exception to trademark infringement under the First Amendment. Specifically, Rogers provides that trademark law does not bar works of artistic expression that (i) meet a minimal level of artistic relevance and (ii) do not explicitly mislead consumers. Under this test, Rothschild argued that his MetaBirkins were protected because they were a commentary on status symbols, the fashion industry, Hermès, and the metaverse. Hermès countered that Rothschild failed to satisfy Rogers because he was using “MetaBirkin” as a trademark and not as an artistic expression because his use served to identify the origin of his commercial goods.

    After the court denied Rothschild’s motion to dismiss and the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the case went to trial at the beginning of February 2023. On February 8, 2023, the jury found for Hermès and awarded the luxury fashion house $133,000 in damages for trademark infringement, dilution, and cybersquatting.

    Takeaways

    The MetaBirkins case provides additional clarity on the interaction of intellectual property law and digital media. Although—as with all infringement cases—this case’s outcome was specific to its facts, NFT creators should exercise additional caution when using or even drawing inspiration from another’s trademarked goods, especially where they offer such works for sale and seek to exploit the reputation of a famous brand, like the evidence showed Rothschild did in this case.

    As MetaBirkins demonstrates, artistic works that provide commentary on the original work are not immune from legal challenges. Creators should take extra precautions to ensure that their artwork does not tread on others’ trademark rights. The best way for creators to mitigate risk is always to obtain a license from the trademark owner that sets forth the desired scope of use. In addition, brands can now have some level of comfort knowing their “real world” intellectual property should have the same protections in the “virtual world.”

    This case is one of several high-profile recent matters concerning the fair use doctrine, and First Amendment challenges to intellectual property infringement claims. As the Supreme Court is poised to rule on the fair use doctrine imminently in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith and later the First Amendment defense in Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, it is important for creators and companies to stay tuned to changes and developments in this area of the law to evaluate risk in this space.

    Practices

    Intellectual Property

    Industries

    Fashion

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      U.S. Copyright Office limits registration for AI-created Zarya of the Dawn graphic novel

      March 9, 2023
    • Alert

      Greenwashing Litigation 101: A brand owner’s guide to avoiding the “fashion police”

      March 8, 2023
    • Alert

      iHeartMedia agrees to pay $400,000 to settle deceptive endorsement claims

      March 6, 2023

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL