Skip to main content

Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About
Trending Topics
    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor, Employment, and Benefits
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations
    Industries

    View All

    • Aviation
    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Nonprofit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Sports & Stadiums
    • Technology
    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

      We help clients create positive return on investments in people, products, and the planet.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    • Women in Dealmaking

      We provide strategic counsel on complex corporate transactions and unite dynamic women in the dealmaking arena.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. HUD reinstates 2013 Disparate Impact Rule: Everything old is new again

      Alerts

    Alert / Affordable Housing

    HUD reinstates 2013 Disparate Impact Rule: Everything old is new again

    March 29, 2023

    LinkedInX (Twitter)EmailCopy URL

    By Harry Kelly

    The reinstatement did not address limits on disparate impact claims imposed by the U.S. Supreme Court, leaving unclear whether housing providers’ tenant selection and property management policies are permissible or expose them to potential liability.

    What’s the impact?

    • The “new” disparate impact rule doesn’t provide clarity to housing providers about key components of disparate impact liability.
    • We anticipate that litigation will arise in an attempt to clarify how the Inclusive Communities standards and the 2023 Rule align.

    DOWNLOAD

    Read about the reinstated Disparate Impact Rule.

    After months of waiting—and to the surprise of almost no one—HUD announced earlier this month that it is reinstating the regulation defining disparate impact liability under the Fair Housing Act (FHAct) that it originally released in 2013. This may mark—at least for now—the end of ten years of regulatory ping-pong over disparate impact liability. What it is unlikely to do is to provide housing providers, lawyers, and judges with clear guidance on how that “new” rule comports with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Tex. Dept. of Hous. & Cmty. Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., 573 U.S. 576 (2015), which affirmed the existence of disparate impact liability under the FHAct but imposed a variety of restrictions on it. Unfortunately, in reinstating the 2013 Rule, HUD didn’t provide much more guidance, leaving housing providers uncertain about whether key policies they adopt to select tenants and manage their properties are in fact permissible or may create liability.

    What is disparate impact?

    Before getting into the recent reinstatement announcement, a little background. “Disparate impact” refers to a theory that holds that liability under the FHAct exists, not only in cases of intentional discrimination, but also where it is shown that a “neutral” policy or practice has a harsher (or “disparate”) impact on a protected class under the FHAct. It’s important because many policies or practices adopted without any discriminatory intent and for good reason by a housing provider may, in practice, have a disparate impact on a protected class—for example, a two-person per bedroom occupancy policy may have a harsher impact on families with minor children if it leads to eviction of a couple in a one-bedroom apartment who has a baby in the course of the lease term.

    HUD’s regulatory seesaw

    For years after the FHAct was adopted, most lower courts had applied some version of disparate impact liability. In 2013, HUD released a regulation attempting to define and formalize disparate impact liability. Two years later, the Inclusive Communities decision confirmed that disparate impact liability exists under the FHAct but, to prevent “abusive” applications of that liability, imposed a series of “safeguards,” such as limiting disparate impact to cases involving “artificial, arbitrary and unnecessary barriers” to housing (e.g., exclusionary zoning rules) and requiring plaintiffs to show a “robust causality” between the challenged practice and the resulting disparate impact.

    What that decision didn’t do is to explain how to incorporate those “safeguards” into the framework of HUD’s 2013 disparate impact rule. In 2020, HUD replaced the 2013 rule with a new disparate impact regulation that expressly addressed the safeguards identified in Inclusive Communities. In doing so, it raised the pleading requirements for plaintiffs so high that, in the view of many, it made proving a disparate impact violation almost impossible. The 2020 rule was stayed almost immediately by a federal court and never really took effect.

    In June 2021, HUD announced it intended to repeal the 2020 rule and reinstate the original 2013 rule. Given its quick start, it’s surprising that it’s taken almost two years to produce a final rule. That delay led some to speculate that perhaps changes to the 2013 rule were being made after all. So much for speculation: In its announcement earlier this month, HUD essentially reinstated the original 2013 rule with very minor additions, and with no attempt to expressly incorporate any of the “safeguards” discussed in the Inclusive Communities decision.

    Why no changes?

    HUD claims that by referring to the 2013 rule several times, the Inclusive Communities decision implicitly endorsed the 2013 rule, and that if the Supreme Court intended to “overhaul disparate impact jurisprudence, the Court would have done so expressly.” It also claims that many of the “safeguards” are already incorporated in the 2013 rule. Maybe, maybe not. Certainly, the Supreme Court was not helpful by identifying multiple “safeguards” but failing to explain how to incorporate them into the so-called “burden-shifting” analysis used by the 2013 rule. Say what you may about the 2020 rule, at least it took those safeguards seriously and attempted, perhaps clumsily, to incorporate them into the liability formula established in the 2013 rule.

    The bottom line

    Whatever else it does, the “new” disparate impact rule doesn’t provide clarity to housing providers about key components of disparate impact liability as explained by the Supreme Court. It looks like the rulemaking is done, but more litigation may be in the offing.

    So what is old is new again. After 10 years of rulemaking and litigation, we are back where we started. Now courts and litigants will have to figure out how to fit the square peg of the Inclusive Communities safeguards into the round hole of the “new” 2023 disparate impact rule.

    Practices

    Affordable HousingSupportive HousingSustainable DevelopmentReal EstateLow Income Housing Tax CreditsSenior Housing & Care

    Industries

    Real Estate

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      HUD publishes new Green and Resilient Retrofit Program funding opportunities

      May 12, 2023
    • Alert

      HUD announces plan to overhaul its Section 504 Regulations

      April 27, 2023
    • Press Release

      Nixon Peabody advises WinnCompanies in connection with major affordable housing rehab

      April 12, 2023
    The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Purchase Order Terms & Conditions
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL
    © 2025 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved