Skip to main content

Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About
Trending Topics
    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor, Employment, and Benefits
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations
    Industries

    View All

    • Aviation
    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Nonprofit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Sports & Stadiums
    • Technology
    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

      We help clients create positive return on investments in people, products, and the planet.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    • Women in Dealmaking

      We provide strategic counsel on complex corporate transactions and unite dynamic women in the dealmaking arena.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. USPTO answers FAQs on Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions

      Alerts

    Alert / Intellectual Property

    USPTO answers FAQs on Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions

    Jan 27, 2025

    LinkedInX (Twitter)EmailCopy URL

    By Ion Moraru, PhD, Matthew Werber and Christian Donovan

    The USPTO clarifies how inventorship is analyzed for artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted inventions.

    What’s the impact?

    • Responding to FAQs on recent Guidance for AI-Assisted inventions, the USPTO clarifies that it did not create a heightened standard for inventorship when AI technologies are used in the creation process.
    • Stakeholders and examiners engaged in inventorship analysis should focus on the human contribution to the conception of an invention.

    DOWNLOAD

    FAQs on Inventorship Guidance for AI-assisted inventions (PDF)

    In February 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions. Expressing the position of the Federal Circuit, the USPTO reiterated that an inventor or joint inventor must be a natural person who has contributed to at least one claim of a patent. Thus, any patent application naming a machine as an inventor or a joint inventor on an Application Data Sheet (ADS), an inventor’s oath or declaration, or a substitute statement has improper inventorship.

    No heightened standard for inventorship

    The USPTO’s new FAQs page indicates that the Guidance did not create a heightened standard for inventorship, and stresses that existing law applies regardless of the tools used in creating an invention. Thus, AI-based inventorship analysis should focus on the human contribution assessed using “guiding principles,” namely:

    • A person’s use of an AI system in creating an AI-assisted invention does not negate the person’s contributions as an inventor;
    • A person merely recognizing a problem and prompting the AI system to produce a solution to the problem is not a proper inventor;
    • A person who takes the output of an AI system and makes a significant contribution to the output to create an invention may be a proper inventor;
    • A person who designs, builds, or trains an AI system in view of a specific problem to elicit a particular solution could be an inventor, where the designing, building, or training of the AI system is a significant contribution to the invention created with the AI system; and
    • A person who maintains intellectual domination over an AI system does not make that person an inventor of any inventions created using the AI system.

    No additional duties of disclosure

    The USPTO also indicates that the Guidance did not impose additional duties to disclose information beyond what is already mandated by existing rules and policies. According to MPEP § 2001, applicants and individuals associated with the filing or prosecution of a patent application are responsible for meeting existing duties to disclose information material to patentability.

    Presumption of inventorship maintained

    And finally, according to the USPTO, the Guidance did not impose additional responsibilities to examiners to investigate inventorship for AI-assisted invention. As such, examiners will continue to presume, without further inquiry, that a named inventor or joint inventor in an application is the actual inventor or joint inventor to be named on the patent. MPEP § 2157.

    Practices

    Intellectual PropertyTechnology Transfer

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      SCOTUS goes 9–0 on affiliate liability under Lanham Act

      March 6, 2025
    • Alert

      Federal Circuit resolves US published patent application prior art date in inter partes reviews

      Jan 17, 2025
    • Alert

      USPTO changes course on controversial proposed rule for terminal disclaimers

      Dec 16, 2024
    The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Purchase Order Terms & Conditions
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL
    © 2025 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved