Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Articles
    4. Illinois Appellate Court holds that BIPA claims by union members are preempted by LMRAArticles

    Article

    Illinois Appellate Court holds that BIPA claims by union members are preempted by LMRA

    Feb 23, 2022

    Share

    By Richard Tilghman IV, Laura Bacon, Brian Alcala and Katherine Letcher

    On Tuesday, the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, followed a series of federal opinions in holding that claims under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) are preempted by the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA).

    On Tuesday, the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, followed a series of federal opinions in holding that claims under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) are preempted by the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA). For employers with union members who have been caught in BIPA’s crosshairs, the decision provides grounds for eliminating or limiting potential BIPA liability.

    In Walton v. Roosevelt University, the plaintiff, a member of the SEIU Local 1, brought suit against his employer, Roosevelt University, asserting that the University had required him to scan his hand into a biometric timekeeping device while clocking in and out of work without obtaining informed written consent. He further alleged that the University had disclosed his biometric data to a third-party payroll service without consent. The plaintiff sought to represent a class of all similarly situated employees. The University moved to dismiss, arguing that the plaintiff was covered by a collective bargaining agreement with a “management rights” clause, the interpretation of which is exclusively governed by the LMRA, preempting BIPA. The trial court denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss, but certified for appeal the question of whether the LMRA preempted the plaintiff’s claims.

    The Illinois Appellate Court sided with the University, holding that the plaintiff’s claims were preempted by the LMRA. In so holding, the court deferred to several prior decisions interpreting the scope of preemption under the LMRA, including the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Fernandez v. Kerry, Inc., 14 F.4th 644 (7th Cir. 2021) in which the court similarly held that BIPA claims were preempted by the LMRA due to the employer’s invoking a broad management rights clause. Referencing BIPA’s provision that a “legally authorized representative” may consent to the collection of biometric information, the Illinois Appellate Court reasoned that it was “clearly within a union’s purview to negotiate with the employer about its members’ biometric information.” Thus, the court concluded that whether the union consented to the biometric collection was not for the court to decide, but was “reserved for arbitration or other bargained-for grievance procedures under the” LMRA and that the plaintiff could not bypass the union and proceed directly in asserting claims against his employer under BIPA. Whether a union member is entitled to relief for alleged privacy violations under the LMRA is an open question dependent on the language of the collective bargaining agreement at issue, but at the very least, the application of the LMRA relieves employers of the statutory damages scheme imposed by BIPA.

    The Walton decision should be welcome relief to employers of union members who have been sued under BIPA, of which there are many. For employers with a mix of union and non-union members, the decision should help limit the scope of BIPA exposure because claims by union members likely are preempted by the LMRA, depending on the language of the collective bargaining agreement at issue and its applicable dispute resolution mechanisms.

    CybersecurityLitigation

    Practices

    LitigationCybersecurity & Privacy

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL