Skip to main content

Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About
Trending Topics
    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor, Employment, and Benefits
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations
    Industries

    View All

    • Aviation
    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Nonprofit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Sports & Stadiums
    • Technology
    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

      We help clients create positive return on investments in people, products, and the planet.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    • Women in Dealmaking

      We provide strategic counsel on complex corporate transactions and unite dynamic women in the dealmaking arena.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Articles
    4. EU Taxonomy Simplification: Impact on Disclosures and Sustainable Investment Strategies

      Articles

    Article

    EU Taxonomy Simplification: Impact on Disclosures and Sustainable Investment Strategies

    Feb 12, 2025

    LinkedInX (Twitter)EmailCopy URL

    By Ed Winters and Chris Schlag

    Companies reporting under the EU Taxonomy may soon benefit from simplified requirements and reduced reporting burdens. Such proposals are part of the broader EU effort to ensure that financial and non-financial entities can better integrate sustainability considerations into their reporting frameworks.

    In 2022, the EU introduced a Taxonomy to help meet 2030 climate and energy goals. This framework is a key component of the EU’s broader ESG strategy. While the Taxonomy was designed to facilitate sustainable investments, it has been criticized as complex and lacking global alignment. In response, the European Commission tasked the EU Platform on Sustainable Finance (PSF) with recommending ways that the Taxonomy could be simplified, resulting in four core proposals to modify the tool.

    Here, we highlight the Taxonomy’s history, PSF’s report proposals, and potential benefits for sustainable disclosures and investments.

    Background on EU Taxonomy for Sustainable Activities

    The EU introduced the Taxonomy in 2022 with its Action Plan on Sustainable Finance, a financial strategy to progress European Green Deal objectives and ambitious 2030 climate and energy targets. Hailed as a progressive and first-of-its kind framework, the Taxonomy was structured to be both a mandatory and voluntary classification tool capable of driving sustainable investments by measuring the sustainability performance of investments and business activities.

    Numerous companies, public entities, and financial actors, however, criticized the Taxonomy for its complexity, imposed reporting burden, limited usability, and inadequate harmonization with other international classification systems and frameworks. For example, the tool can be difficult to apply to different economic activities because of complexities in definitions, analyses, and criteria. Inconsistencies in tool use and users’ understanding of reporting requirements have also led to significant variations in business disclosures.

    PSF’s Recommendations to Modify the EU Taxonomy

    To address these concerns and ensure the EU’s sustainability policies are not an obstacle to business competitiveness, the European Commission tasked PSF, an external expert advisory body, with finding ways to simplify the Taxonomy and improve its utility. PSF welcomed the challenge and after years of analysis and public consultation, issued a detailed report, with four core proposals.

    • Proposal No. 1: Reduce the Corporate Reporting Burden. PSF determined that a primary obstacle to the Taxonomy’s effectiveness is its reporting burden. To reduce reporting obligations, PSF recommended subtle changes in reporting requirements, increased flexibility, and improved alignment with other financial reporting frameworks. For instance, PSF suggested simplifying operational expenditure (OpEx) reporting to align more closely with financial reporting standards. PSF also proposed a materiality threshold for corporate Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), which would allow companies to exclude immaterial business segments from their reporting.
    • Proposal No. 2: Simplify and Improve Green Asset Ratio (GAR) Disclosures. PSF found that a second obstacle to Taxonomy effectiveness is the inability to compare disclosures due to limitations in the design and use of GAR disclosures. To improve these disclosures and increase sustainable investments, PSF recommended ensuring ratio symmetry, allowing estimates for non-EU and retail exposures, simplifying retail assessments, and aligning disclosures with other ESG disclosure and reporting frameworks. PSF similarly recommended a gradual integration of exposures into GAR, streamlining small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) reporting, and including sovereign and government agency exposures with the option to use estimates. Finally, to enhance data accessibility and usability, PSF recommends establishing safe harbors for financial reporting and providing clear guidelines on the use of estimates, proxies, and data sources.
    • Proposal No. 3: Take a Practical Approach to “Do No Significant Harm” (DNSH) criteria. PSF determined that a third obstacle to the Taxonomy’s effectiveness is that DNSH criteria is overly complex and cannot be applied to financial and non-financial entities equally. To reduce this complexity, PSF recommended a review of DNSH criteria for non-financial companies, such as simplified turnover considerations, and reduced verification and documentation requirements for financial institutions. Additionally, PSF suggested introducing materiality principles to ensure proportionality in reporting while setting clearer Key Performance Indicator (KPI) thresholds for turnover and capital expenditure assessments. PSF also encouraged a temporary “comply or explain” approach for DNSH assessment of the Turnover KPI, which would alleviate some reporting obstacles.
    • Proposal No. 4: Incorporate Ways for SMEs to Access Sustainable Finance Options. Finally, PSF concluded that the Taxonomy, in its current form, puts a significant reporting burden on SMEs. PSF therefore recommended numerous changes in criteria and reporting requirements to reduce, streamline, and simplify SME reporting obligations.

    Next Steps for the EU Taxonomy

    PSF’s report and recommendations will be a topic of discussion during European Commission meetings on EU Sustainability Policy, which are currently underway. If the European Commission chooses to adopt PSF’s recommendations, the EU Taxonomy could be overhauled through a legislation package with proposed changes.

    Potential Impact on Sustainability Disclosures and Investments

    While PSF’s core proposals for refining the EU Taxonomy need further examination and public consultation, they represent a positive step forward. PSF’s proposals aim to preserve the EU’s objectives of increasing sustainable investments, while addressing key challenges in Taxonomy use, such as reporting burdens and complexity.

    Simplifying the Taxonomy, aligning it with other international reporting frameworks, and streamlining the process for users is welcome as it will undoubtedly facilitate more effective engagement. Having a more straightforward and practical tool for reporting, with clarified definitions and requirements, will also simplify the process for businesses to manage sustainable investments and meet the Taxonomy’s reporting requirements.

    In turn, businesses may have improved access to sustainable finance options. Financial institutions will also have access to more accurate, helpful, and comparable information to inform sustainable investment decisions, making the Taxonomy a more practical tool for advancing sustainability in the European market.

    Nixon Peabody’s ESG Team is dedicated to helping you stay ahead of emerging and evolving ESG reporting and disclosure requirements. We provide guidance to navigate current and future regulations, ensuring your business remains compliant and competitive.

    Practices

    Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG)European UnionCorporate & FinancePrivate Equity & Investment Funds

    Insights And Happenings

    • Article

      Shifting Standards for Ethics & Compliance Audits

      March 11, 2025
    • Article

      EU's Omnibus Package: Simplifying Sustainability Reporting and Administrative Burdens

      March 10, 2025
    • Press Release

      Nixon Peabody attorneys, practice areas recognized by Chambers Global as industry leaders

      Feb 18, 2025
    The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Purchase Order Terms & Conditions
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL
    © 2025 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved