Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. DEI and corporate governance: Increasing board diversityAlerts

    Alert / DEI Strategic Services

    DEI and corporate governance: Increasing board diversity

    Oct 11, 2022

    Share

    By Kamau Coar, Stacie Collier, Kendal Tyre and Rekha ChiruvoluLark Toney is a legal intern in Nixon Peabody's Labor & Employment practice and assisted with the preparation of this alert.

    How are legislative requirements impacting board diversity?

    • Calls for greater diversity in organizations have put a spotlight on board composition and board oversight of DEI programs
    • State and federal legislatures and agencies have added to the calls for boards to increase board diversity through various legislative and compliance requirements
    •  As boards work to answer the calls for greater diversity in the boardroom, it is important that directors are well-informed, advised, and prepared on the various aspects of director selection

    DOWNLOADS

    • PDF: Increasing board diversity

    Join our mailing list for news, events, and latest developments relating to DEI Strategic ServicesSubscribe

    Overview

    For the roughly 1.8 million nonprofit organizations and 5,000 public companies in the United States, boards generally oversee the activities of their organization, and are responsible for the direction and operations of the company under state corporate laws.

    For those organizations, studies have long confirmed the clear business case for board diversity—heterogeneity allows boards to better identify and manage risks due to the range of experiences and skill sets that diversity brings to boardroom discussions. CEOs also recognize that a diverse board leads to a better understanding of customers and the ability to build better products and services for those customers.[1]

    In addition to the business case for diversity and the reputational benefits that accompany having a diverse board (or negative impacts for a board lacking diversity), efforts to identify and attract diverse directors are quickly becoming a legal and compliance issue as well. While shareholders have led efforts over the last decade to increase board diversity through various corporate governance levers, legislative changes introduced new pressures on organizations.

    All of these efforts to increase board diversity have led to some progress in diverse representation in the boardroom. Over the last decade, racial diversity on boards has increased from 13.3% in 2012 to 21.5% in 2022, with gender diversity increasing from 16.6% to 31% over the same period.[2]

    In this series, we are going to take you on a three-part journey exploring how the business case for board diversity and corporate DEI strategies more broadly intersect with the legal obligations, corporate governance, and other key areas that impact your business.

    How are legislative requirements impacting board diversity?

    Beginning in 2018, laws passed in California mandating gender, racial, and ethnic diversity on the boards of public companies headquartered in the state garnered a lot of attention. The U.S. was not the first country to consider legislative action in pursuit of greater board diversity from its companies, however. Since 1999, nearly 20 governments around the world have instituted diversity efforts in boards, namely gender quotas. Quotas and related target-based provisions for publicly traded firms are currently at different stages of consideration in Canada, the EU, Germany, Scotland, South Africa, and the United Arab Emirates. Quotas in these countries range anywhere from requiring one female director (Israel, India, Pakistan) to 40% female representation (Norway, Spain, Iceland).

    In addition to California, U.S. states like Illinois, Maryland, New York, and Washington have introduced laws designed to increase board diversity, ranging from reporting requirements to representation mandates.[3] And at least seven other states are considering or encouraging diversity legislation.[4]

    Illinois has legislation aimed at promoting gender, racial, and ethnic diversity on boards through reporting requirements.[5]

    Both Maryland and New York have laws requiring certain businesses to disclose the number of women on their boards.[6]

    Washington state requires certain boards to be made up of at least 25% women. If the requirement is not met, those companies must explain why and disclose methods taken to address their lack of gender diversity.[7]

    On the federal level, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved a proposal from Nasdaq to require all listed companies to disclose board-level diversity using a standard template and have a least two directors from underrepresented groups, “including one who self-identifies as female and one who self-identifies as either an underrepresented minority or LGBTQ+,” or explain why they do not.[8] The SEC Regulatory Agenda currently targets April 2023 for proposed rule amendments to enhance disclosures about the diversity of board members and nominees.

    While efforts to encourage and require board diversity continue to grow across the country, there has also been pushback. Following the passage of California’s two laws requiring minimum levels of diverse representation on public company boards, two recent rulings have held that the legislation violated the Equal Protection Clause of California’s constitution.[9] California’s secretary of state has announced an intention to appeal both rulings. The Fifth Circuit also recently heard arguments in litigation challenging the SEC’s approval of Nasdaq’s board diversity disclosure rules.[10]

    So what does this mean for you and your organization?

    As stewards for their organizations, it is important that boards are well-informed, advised, and prepared on the various aspects of director selection, from the strategic benefits to the enterprise and reputational risks. Boards must understand applicable laws and their reporting requirements. And they must also be prepared for the possibility of director candidates who are not selected challenging those decisions as discriminatory.

    We recommend that boards regularly review all aspects of their board refreshment processes, from the skills matrix and nomination process to the laws that apply to governance and disclosure requirements. We also recommend that as part of their regular governance review, boards ensure that they are prepared for shareholder and stakeholder inquiries that may arise.

    Up next

    The next piece in this series will focus on recent shareholder litigation and its impact on board diversity.

    Nixon Peabody’s DEI Strategic Services works with clients to develop inclusive cultures, drive business success, and elevate their brands. Learn more about our three-phased approach to help clients: (1) assess current efforts, (2) address challenges, and (3) guide long-term success.


    1. Esther Shein, “CEOs say diverse corporate boards are a necessity: Here’s how to build one,” TechRepublic (Aug. 9, 2021, 11:32 AM).
      [Back to reference]
    2. “Missing Pieces: Women and Minorities on Fortune 500 Boards,” Alliance for Board Diversity, 15 (Aug. 15, 2013).
      [Back to reference]
    3. Maeve Allsup, “Diversity Disclosure Rules Thrive as Mandates Die in Court (1),” Bloomberg Law (Jun. 14, 2022, 4:45 AM).
      [Back to reference]
    4. Id.
      [Back to reference]
    5. Richard A. Benton & Eunmi Mun, Illinois Corporate Board Diversity, Inclusion, and Representation Report – 2021, 1 (last visited Sept. 9, 2022).
      [Back to reference]
    6. Executive Alliance (last visited Sept. 9, 2022).
      [Back to reference]
    7. Natalie Guevara, “What to know about Washington’s new rules for boardroom diversity,” Puget Sound Business Journal (Feb. 28, 2021).
      [Back to reference]
    8. Nasdaq, Nasdaq’s Board Diversity Rule, what Nasdaq-listed companies should know (2022).
      [Back to reference]
    9. Alisha Haridasani Gupta, “Another California board diversity law was struck down, but it already had a big impact,” N.Y. Times: Daily Business Briefing (May 19, 2022).
      [Back to reference]
    10. Alexander Osipovich, “Nasdaq Board-Diversity Rule Takes Center Stage in Court Battle,” Wall St. J. (Aug. 29, 2022).
      [Back to reference]

    Practices

    Corporate & FinanceDEI Strategic Services

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      M&A outlook — what to expect in 2023

      Feb 6, 2023
    • Article

      DEI is an action verb

      Dec 14, 2022
    • Alert

      DEI considerations for the 2023 proxy season

      Nov 14, 2022

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL