Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. California Supreme Court characterizes break “premiums” as wagesAlerts

    Alert / Labor & Employment Alert

    California Supreme Court characterizes break “premiums” as wages

    June 2, 2022

    Share

    By Robert Pepple and Jonathan Assia

    The California Supreme Court just tripled the liability in most wage and hour lawsuits—by redefining unpaid meal and rest break “premiums” as unpaid “wages.”

    What’s the Impact?

    • California law punishes the failure to pay earned wages much more severely than the failure to pay penalties—this redefinition of premiums as wages means the more severe penalty scheme now applies to meal and rest beak claims
    • This decision is Christmas in Summer for the plaintiffs’ bar; it both increases the liability in each case and makes them more difficult to defend
    • If the plaintiffs’ bar hasn’t found you yet, they’re definitely coming for you now; and if you’ve been hit before, they’ll probably be coming back—review your policies and get good counsel; sadly, you’re going to need it

    DOWNLOADS

    If you’re a California employer, you’re probably already familiar with the state’s highly technical meal break and rest period rules. Meal breaks must be 30 minutes, duty free, uninterrupted, and must begin before the end of the fifth hour of work. Rest periods must be 10 minutes, duty free, uninterrupted, and be taken in the middle of each four-hour period of time, when practicable. If you fail to adhere to these rules, you could be liable for up to one meal break and one rest break “premium” per day. That premium is defined by Labor Code section 226.7 as “one additional hour of pay at the employee’s regular rate of compensation.” Whether these premiums are classified as “penalties” or “wages” have serious implications for employers in wage and hour lawsuits, and was the question presented to the California Supreme Court recently in Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc.

    On May 23, 2022, the California Supreme Court found that premiums for non-compliant meal and rest breaks under California law are “wages” and not “penalties,” thereby overturning the California Court of Appeals.

    In 2019, the Court of Appeals held that premiums were penalties because they were not a payment for hours worked. Indeed, the statutory requirement is a 30-minute off-duty meal break or 10 off-duty minutes for a rest period. The premium, on the other hand, is an hour of pay regardless of whether a break was late, short, missed, or interrupted—i.e., there is no mathematical relationship between the amount of the premium and the reason it is awarded. It’s the same amount whether a break is short by one second or one minute, or whether an employee has to work for 5 seconds or 5 minutes during the break. Thus, meal and rest premiums are unlike overtime premiums, and they always have been. To get around this straight-forward and time-honored logic, the supreme court invented a new kind of compensation under California law, a wage-penalty hybrid. And the ruling applies retroactively.

    The California Supreme Court characterized meal and rest break premiums under Labor Code section 226.7 as both “wages” and statutory penalties, reasoning that “an employee becomes entitled to premium pay for missed or noncompliant meal and rest breaks precisely because she was required to work when she should have been relieved of duty.” This analysis conveniently ignores the fact that employers already would have an obligation to pay employees for any time worked during a meal or rest break.

    Regardless, now the law is that “premiums are wages,” and it is not just an academic or semantic point. The supreme court’s characterization of break premiums as wages means that failure to pay them is tantamount to a failure to pay earned wages, which leads to a “parade of horribles” under the Labor Code. This is because the Labor Code punishes the non-payment of wages in several ways that are sometimes called “derivative penalties”—for violations such as a failure to pay wages timely during employment (Lab. Code 204): failure to issue accurate itemized paystubs (Lab. Code 226), failure to pay all wages upon separation of employment (Lab. Code 201-203), and more.

    The practical (and negative) implications for employers in this legal landscape are hard to overstate. In most wage and hour lawsuits, the amount of alleged unpaid wages pales in comparison to the alleged unpaid meal and rest break premiums. But now, as explained above, the (new) hybrid wage-penalty-premium is a full hour of pay at the employee’s regular rate of compensation, regardless of whether a meal break was one minute late, or a rest period was interrupted by one minute of work, etc. Moreover, employers generally have “hard” evidence to defeat a true unpaid wages claim (e.g., using time clock records and/or shift schedules). However, no such “hard” evidence exists to defeat many theories of meal and rest break violations, which often require employers to “prove a negative”—i.e., that a meal break or rest break was not interrupted.

    Takeaways for employers

    The California Supreme Court just made meal break and rest or break claims much harder for employers to defend, and exponentially more expensive if lost. So now more than ever, California employers should re-evaluate their policies and practices related to meal and rest periods, timekeeping, and itemized wage statements to ensure maximal compliance with the law.

    Locations

    Los AngelesSan Francisco

    Practices

    Labor RelationsLabor & EmploymentLabor & Employment LitigationCalifornia Labor & EmploymentWage-Hour Compliance & LitigationWorkplace: Policies, Procedures & Training

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      Seviour-Iloff v. LaPaille provides guidance on numerous California wage & hour issues, including personal liability

      Sep 9, 2022
    • Alert

      New Anti-Sexual Harassment requirements for Chicago employers go into effect July 1

      June 29, 2022
    • Alert

      Viking River court holds that employers can compel PAGA lawsuits to individual arbitration—if their arbitration agreements have two key components

      June 22, 2022

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL