Skip to main content

Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About
Trending Topics
    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor, Employment, and Benefits
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations
    Industries

    View All

    • Aviation
    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Nonprofit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Sports & Stadiums
    • Technology
    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

      We help clients create positive return on investments in people, products, and the planet.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    • Women in Dealmaking

      We provide strategic counsel on complex corporate transactions and unite dynamic women in the dealmaking arena.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. U.S. Supreme Court in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt clarifies “salary basis” test for HCEs paid on daily basis

      Alerts

    Alert / Labor & Employment

    U.S. Supreme Court in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt clarifies “salary basis” test for HCEs paid on daily basis

    Feb 28, 2023

    LinkedInX (Twitter)EmailCopy URL

    The High Court provided important guidance on what it means to be a Highly Compensated Employee with respect to non-traditional forms of “salary” compensation.

    What’s the impact?

    • Employers who pay employees on a daily basis, but do not pay overtime due to the Highly Compensated Employee (“HCE”) exemption, should re-evaluate those practices;
    • Employers who want to pay employees on a non-traditional “salary” basis now have important guidance on how those paradigms should be structured;
    • The Helix decision provides important context for how SCOTUS construes the interpreting regulations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) generally.

    DOWNLOAD

    PDF: The Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt Case

    On February 22, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt, a case that clarifies the definition of the “salary basis” test, particularly for highly compensated employees paid on a daily basis. This decision provides important guidance for employers with high-earning employees that earn compensation under non-traditional “salary” paradigms.

    Background

    Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employers are required to pay their employees a minimum wage and overtime pay for hours worked in excess of 40 hours per week, unless the employee is exempt from these requirements. One exemption under the FLSA is for employees who meet the salary basis test, which means they are paid a predetermined and fixed salary that is not subject to reduction based on variations in the quality or quantity of work performed. To qualify for the exemption, an employee must meet both the salary basis test and the duties test, which determines whether the employee’s job duties are administrative, executive, or professional. The salary threshold for the exemption is currently $684 per week, or $35,568 per year. (See 29 CFR §§ 541.100, 541.601(b)(1).)

    The FLSA regulations also exempt workers known as highly compensated employees (HCEs). To qualify as an HCE, an employee must earn at least $107,432 annually and meet a relaxed version of the duties test (i.e., “[T]he employee customarily and regularly performs any one or more of the exempt duties or responsibilities of an executive, administrative[,] or professional employee”) (See 29 CFR § 541.601(a)(1).)

    The final regulation at issue was 29 CFR § 541.604, which deals with “Minimum guarantee[s] plus extras” (Section 604). Section 604 provides in relevant part:

    An employer may provide an exempt employee with additional compensation without losing the exemption or violating the salary basis requirement, if the employment arrangement also includes a guarantee of at least the minimum weekly[]required amount paid on a salary basis. Thus, for example, an exempt employee guaranteed at least $684 each week paid on a salary basis may also receive additional compensation of a one percent commission on sales.

    (id., subd. (a).). Section 604 goes on to say that such compensation may be “computed on an hourly, a daily[,] or a shift basis.” (id., subd. (b).)

    The Supreme Court held that “daily[]rate” workers can qualify as paid on a salary basis—but only if the compensation scheme satisfies the “special rule” of Section 604, including the minimum weekly guarantee. Because it was undisputed that Hewitt’s compensation had no such minimum guarantee (i.e., it was a pure day-rate paradigm), the court concluded that Hewitt, although highly paid, was not exempt from the FLSA.

    The Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt case

    Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt involved a group of offshore drilling platform managers who were paid on a daily basis and classified as HCEs. Hewitt himself earned over $963 per day (which equated to more than $200,000 annually), but there was no weekly or other minimum salary guarantee. Hewitt filed a collective action against Helix, alleging that he, and those like him, were improperly classified as exempt from overtime pay.

    The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the HCE exemption applied to employees who were paid on a daily basis. The Court held that the HCE exemption can apply to employees paid on a daily basis, but only if the employees receive at least the minimum weekly salary amount on a salary or fee basis, which Hewitt did not.

    In other words, the Court clarified that the HCE salary threshold applies to employees who are paid on a daily basis, but their daily pay can only count toward meeting the salary threshold if they are paid a minimum salary or fee amount each week. The Court explained that this interpretation is consistent with the purpose of the HCE exemption, which is to provide a streamlined exemption for highly compensated employees who perform duties that are similar to those of other exempt employees.

    Implications of the Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt decision

    The Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt decision provides important guidance for employers who have HCEs who are paid on a daily basis. To qualify for the HCE exemption, these employees must now be paid at least $684 per week on a salary or fee basis, regardless of their daily pay rate.

    Employers who do not comply with this requirement may face liability for unpaid overtime wages and other damages. On the other hand, HCEs who are paid on a daily basis and do not receive at least the minimum weekly salary amount on a salary or fee basis may be entitled to overtime pay.

    In conclusion, the Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt decision clarifies the “salary basis” test for HCEs paid on a daily basis and underscores the  importance of complying with FLSA requirements. Employers who have questions about how to classify their employees should consult with an experienced employment law attorney to ensure compliance with the FLSA and other applicable wage and hour laws.

    Practices

    Labor RelationsOccupational Safety & Health (OSHA)Labor, Employment & BenefitsCalifornia Labor & EmploymentWorkplace Policies, Procedures & TrainingLabor & Employment Litigation

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      California Court rules on COVID reimbursement for remote work during Pandemic

      July 24, 2023
    • Alert

      NLRB reverses course and expands protections for employee misconduct

      May 9, 2023
    • Alert

      Updated—City of Los Angeles "Fair Work Week" Ordinance Becomes Effective April 1 2023

      April 5, 2023
    The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Purchase Order Terms & Conditions
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL
    © 2025 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved