Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About

Trending Topics

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni

    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor & Employment
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations

    Industries

    View All

    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Entertainment
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Non Profit
    • Real Estate
    • Technology

    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. Strategies for severance agreements after NLRB’s decision in McLaren MacombAlerts

    Alert / Labor & Employment

    Strategies for severance agreements after NLRB’s decision in McLaren Macomb

    Feb 27, 2023

    Share

    By Kimberly Harding, Michael Lingle and Robert Pepple

    The National Labor Relations Board ruled that offering severance agreements with certain confidentiality and/or non-disparagement prohibitions violates the National Labor Relations Act.

    What’s the impact?

    • In light of this decision, employers should assess separation strategies as they pertain to severance agreements with non-supervisory employees
    • Don’t panic—employers have many options available to address and accommodate this new development

    The National Labor Relations Board (Board) has many employers on their heels after it issued a decision last week holding that an employer violates the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) “when it proffers a severance agreement with provisions that would restrict employees’ exercise of their NLRA rights,” including agreements containing broad confidentiality and/or non-disparagement prohibitions.

    The Board in McLaren Macomb analyzed two provisions contained in separation agreements offered to 11 furloughed employees, one that prohibited the employees from making statements that could disparage or harm the image of the employer and another that prohibited them from disclosing the terms of the agreement. Overturning its prior decisions (under the Trump Board) in Baylor University Medical Center and IGT d/b/a International Game Technology which analyzed the circumstances surrounding the proffer of the agreement, the Board in McLaren Macomb analyzed solely the plain language of these provisions and found that they had the potential to restrict employees from engaging in activity protected by the NLRA, including filing unfair labor practice charges with the Board and/or attempting to “improve their lot as employees through channels outside the immediate employee-employer relationship” (e.g., administrative, judicial, legislative, and political forums; newspapers, the media, social media, and communications to the public that are part of and related to an ongoing labor dispute). Because the provisions in the severance agreements could operate to restrain such conduct, even if the separating employees agreed to them willingly, the Board held the provisions were unlawful.

    The McLaren Macomb decision requires employers to re-evaluate separation strategies pertaining to severance agreements with non-supervisory employees.[1] Specifically, employers must weigh the risk of a potential unfair labor practice charge against the benefits of confidentiality and/or non-disparagement provisions. On the one hand, the remedies typically imposed by the Board against an employer for violating the NLRA (i.e., striking of the provision and/or posting a notice agreeing not to engage in similar behavior) are generally not burdensome or overly disruptive to operations. On the other hand, employers rarely, if ever, seek to enforce confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses; such provisions often serve as more of a “deterrent” than meaningful legal protection.[2]

    The implications of this decision, on its face, appear striking and far-reaching. However, employers need not overreact, as there are numerous ways to work within the McLaren Macomb framework and still obtain some form of contractual promises from separating employees. These strategies include, but are not limited to, narrowing the language of the provisions, adding sweeping disclaimers, eliminating the provisions altogether, or, in some cases, doing nothing.[3]

    Employers are encouraged to engage counsel to evaluate all potential courses of action and select the approach most appropriate for their own situation.


    1. As a reminder, supervisory employees do not enjoy the protections of Section 7 of the Act and severance agreements with them accordingly are unaffected by this decision.
      [back to reference ]
    2. It is also material to the analysis that some states, including California, already have similar laws that limit or outright prohibit certain types of confidentiality provisions in severance agreements (See Cal. Civ. Code § 1001).
      [back to reference ]
    3. And there is also the (very likely) possibility that this decision will be challenged and overturned by the federal courts, but as of the time of publication, no such challenge has been filed.
      [back to reference ]

    Practices

    Labor & EmploymentLabor RelationsLabor & Employment LitigationCalifornia Labor & EmploymentWorkplace: Policies, Procedures & Training

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      U.S. Supreme Court in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt clarifies "salary basis" test for HCEs paid on daily basis

      Feb 28, 2023
    • Alert

      Ninth Circuit holds California’s attempted ban of mandatory arbitration preempted by the FAA

      Feb 22, 2023
    • Alert

      COVID health emergencies formally ending in May — What health plan sponsors need to know

      Feb 7, 2023

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • © 2023 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Supplier Diversity Program
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL