Skip to main content

Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About
Trending Topics
    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor, Employment, and Benefits
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations
    Industries

    View All

    • Aviation
    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Nonprofit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Sports & Stadiums
    • Technology
    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

      We help clients create positive return on investments in people, products, and the planet.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    • Women in Dealmaking

      We provide strategic counsel on complex corporate transactions and unite dynamic women in the dealmaking arena.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. Strategies for severance agreements after NLRB’s decision in McLaren Macomb

      Alerts

    Alert / Labor & Employment

    Strategies for severance agreements after NLRB’s decision in McLaren Macomb

    Feb 27, 2023

    LinkedInX (Twitter)EmailCopy URL

    By Kimberly Harding and Michael Lingle

    The National Labor Relations Board ruled that offering severance agreements with certain confidentiality and/or non-disparagement prohibitions violates the National Labor Relations Act.

    What’s the impact?

    • In light of this decision, employers should assess separation strategies as they pertain to severance agreements with non-supervisory employees
    • Don’t panic—employers have many options available to address and accommodate this new development

    DOWNLOAD

    PDF: Severance agreements after McLaren Macomb decision

    The National Labor Relations Board (Board) has many employers on their heels after it issued a decision last week holding that an employer violates the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) “when it proffers a severance agreement with provisions that would restrict employees’ exercise of their NLRA rights,” including agreements containing broad confidentiality and/or non-disparagement prohibitions.

    The Board in McLaren Macomb analyzed two provisions contained in separation agreements offered to 11 furloughed employees, one that prohibited the employees from making statements that could disparage or harm the image of the employer and another that prohibited them from disclosing the terms of the agreement. Overturning its prior decisions (under the Trump Board) in Baylor University Medical Center and IGT d/b/a International Game Technology which analyzed the circumstances surrounding the proffer of the agreement, the Board in McLaren Macomb analyzed solely the plain language of these provisions and found that they had the potential to restrict employees from engaging in activity protected by the NLRA, including filing unfair labor practice charges with the Board and/or attempting to “improve their lot as employees through channels outside the immediate employee-employer relationship” (e.g., administrative, judicial, legislative, and political forums; newspapers, the media, social media, and communications to the public that are part of and related to an ongoing labor dispute). Because the provisions in the severance agreements could operate to restrain such conduct, even if the separating employees agreed to them willingly, the Board held the provisions were unlawful.

    The McLaren Macomb decision requires employers to re-evaluate separation strategies pertaining to severance agreements with non-supervisory employees.[1] Specifically, employers must weigh the risk of a potential unfair labor practice charge against the benefits of confidentiality and/or non-disparagement provisions. On the one hand, the remedies typically imposed by the Board against an employer for violating the NLRA (i.e., striking of the provision and/or posting a notice agreeing not to engage in similar behavior) are generally not burdensome or overly disruptive to operations. On the other hand, employers rarely, if ever, seek to enforce confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses; such provisions often serve as more of a “deterrent” than meaningful legal protection.[2]

    The implications of this decision, on its face, appear striking and far-reaching. However, employers need not overreact, as there are numerous ways to work within the McLaren Macomb framework and still obtain some form of contractual promises from separating employees. These strategies include, but are not limited to, narrowing the language of the provisions, adding sweeping disclaimers, eliminating the provisions altogether, or, in some cases, doing nothing.[3]

    Employers are encouraged to engage counsel to evaluate all potential courses of action and select the approach most appropriate for their own situation.


    1. As a reminder, supervisory employees do not enjoy the protections of Section 7 of the Act and severance agreements with them accordingly are unaffected by this decision.
      [back to reference ]
    2. It is also material to the analysis that some states, including California, already have similar laws that limit or outright prohibit certain types of confidentiality provisions in severance agreements (See Cal. Civ. Code § 1001).
      [back to reference ]
    3. And there is also the (very likely) possibility that this decision will be challenged and overturned by the federal courts, but as of the time of publication, no such challenge has been filed.
      [back to reference ]

    Practices

    Labor, Employment & BenefitsLabor RelationsLabor & Employment LitigationCalifornia Labor & EmploymentWorkplace Policies, Procedures & Training

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      California Court rules on COVID reimbursement for remote work during Pandemic

      July 24, 2023
    • Alert

      The NLRB General Counsel targets non-competition agreements

      June 6, 2023
    • Alert

      NLRB reverses course and expands protections for employee misconduct

      May 9, 2023
    The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Purchase Order Terms & Conditions
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL
    © 2025 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved