Skip to main content

Nixon Peabody LLP

  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • About
Trending Topics
    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    Practices

    View All

    • Affordable Housing
    • Community Development Finance
    • Corporate & Finance
    • Cybersecurity & Privacy
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Environmental
    • Franchising & Distribution
    • Government Investigations & White Collar Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Services
    • Labor, Employment, and Benefits
    • Litigation
    • Private Wealth & Advisory
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Regulatory & Government Relations
    Industries

    View All

    • Aviation
    • Cannabis
    • Consumer
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Higher Education
    • Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
    • Nonprofit Organizations
    • Real Estate
    • Sports & Stadiums
    • Technology
    Value-Added Services

    View All

    • Alternative Fee Arrangements

      Developing innovative pricing structures and alternative fee agreement models that deliver additional value for our clients.

    • Continuing Education

      Advancing professional knowledge and offering credits for attorneys, staff and other professionals.

    • Crisis Advisory

      Helping clients respond correctly when a crisis occurs.

    • DEI Strategic Services

      Providing our clients with legal, strategic, and practical advice to make transformational changes in their organizations.

    • eDiscovery

      Leveraging law and technology to deliver sound solutions.

    • Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

      We help clients create positive return on investments in people, products, and the planet.

    • Global Services

      Delivering seamless service through partnerships across the globe.

    • Innovation

      Leveraging leading-edge technology to guide change and create seamless, collaborative experiences for clients and attorneys.

    • IPED

      Industry-leading conferences focused on affordable housing, tax credits, and more.

    • Legal Project Management

      Providing actionable information to support strategic decision-making.

    • Legally Green

      Teaming with clients to advance sustainable projects, mitigate the effects of climate change, and protect our planet.

    • Nixon Peabody Trust Company

      Offering a range of investment management and fiduciary services.

    • NP Capital Connector

      Bringing together companies and investors for tomorrow’s new deals.

    • NP Second Opinion

      Offering fresh insights on cases that are delayed, over budget, or off-target from the desired resolution.

    • NP Trial

      Courtroom-ready lawyers who can resolve disputes early on clients’ terms or prevail at trial before a judge or jury.

    • Social Impact

      Creating positive impact in our communities through increasing equity, access, and opportunity.

    • Women in Dealmaking

      We provide strategic counsel on complex corporate transactions and unite dynamic women in the dealmaking arena.

    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Alerts
    4. The NLRB General Counsel targets non-competition agreements

      Alerts

    Alert / Labor & Employment

    The NLRB General Counsel targets non-competition agreements

    June 6, 2023

    LinkedInX (Twitter)EmailCopy URL

    By Stephanie Caffera and Michael Lingle

    Employers should be aware of this new line of attack on non-competition agreements.

    What’s the impact?

    • General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo asserts that non-competition agreements impede “protected concerted activity” under the National Labor Relations Act and signals her intention to bring this issue before the NLRB.
    • Employers should review their use of non-competition agreements and consult with legal counsel on the scope of their non-compete restrictions.

    DOWNLOAD

    PDF: The NLRB General Counsel targets non-competition agreements

    In a move foreshadowed by the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board in prior guidance concerning the enforceability of certain clauses in severance agreements, the General Counsel has now squarely taken aim at striking down non-competition agreements.[1]

    In Memorandum GC 23-08, General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo continues to push the scope of “protected concerted activity” under the National Labor Relations Act (the Act). Abruzzo opines that broad non-competition provisions, which employees reasonably could view as preventing them from quitting or changing jobs, “chill” five specific types of activity protected by the Act:

    • Threatening to resign to demand better working conditions—According to the General Counsel, employees with non-competes would find threatening to resign “futile” due to the lack of other employment opportunities and the fear of retaliatory legal action by the employer for threatening to breach their non-competition agreements.
    • Carrying out concerted threats to resign or otherwise concertedly resigning to secure improved working conditions—The General Counsel opines that such a right follows from established law, although she admits the Board law does not “unequivocally” recognize that right.
    • Concertedly seeking or accepting employment with a local competitor to obtain better working conditions—A typical non-compete agreement would directly prohibit this type of activity.
    • Soliciting coworkers to resign to work for a local competitor—The General Counsel believes a chilling effect on this activity is likely because employees cannot accept such employment without breaching their non-competition agreements and due to fear of retaliation.
    • Seeking employment to specifically engage in protected activity with other workers at an employer’s workplace—In some cases, according to the General Counsel, “mobility” is required for some forms of activity, such as union organizing, which involves obtaining work with multiple employers in a specific trade and geographic region.

    As a result, the General Counsel ultimately opines, “the proffer, maintenance, and enforcement of a non-compete provision that reasonably tends to chill employees from engaging in Section 7 activity as described above violate Section 8(a)(1) unless the provision is narrowly tailored to special circumstances justifying the infringement on employee rights.”

    The General Counsel acknowledges that there are limited circumstances where non-competition agreements would not violate the Act. Agreements that only restrict managerial or ownership interests in a competing business, rather than employment, for example, would not implicate Section 7. Abruzzo also accepts the possibility that “special circumstances” might justify infringement of employees’ Section 7 rights, although she does not elaborate on what those circumstances might be. Significantly, however, the General Counsel notes that “a desire to avoid competition from a former employee” and “protecting special investments in training” do not justify broad non-competition agreements. In addition, she comments that “[i]t is unlikely an employer’s justification would be considered reasonable in common situations where overbroad non-compete provisions are imposed on low-wage or middle-wage workers who lack access to trade secrets or other protectible interests, or in states where non-compete provisions are unenforceable.”

    Until the Board adopts the General Counsel’s position, the GC Memorandum has no independent legal effect, but instead, it encourages regional leadership to bring challenges to such provisions, increasing the likelihood of future enforcement activity. In essence, Abruzzo’s Memorandum is a directive to the NLRB Regional Directors to issue complaints about non-competition agreements as a way to bring this issue before the Board. We will have to wait and see whether the General Counsel’s position gains traction with the Board and, if so, whether it survives nearly certain judicial scrutiny.

    In the meantime, employers should be aware of this new line of attack on non-competition agreements and be on the lookout for future developments. In light of efforts by the Federal Trade Commission to ban non-competition agreements and now the General Counsel’s attack on such agreements, employers may wish to take this opportunity to review their use of non-competition agreements with lower wage workers in particular and consult with legal counsel on the scope of their non-compete restrictions.

    For more information on the content of this alert, please contact your Nixon Peabody attorney.


    [1] The General Counsel joins the Federal Trade Commission in its effort to ban non-competition agreements.

    Locations

    Rochester

    Practices

    Labor, Employment & BenefitsLabor & Employment LitigationLabor RelationsNon-Compete & Trade SecretsWorkplace Policies, Procedures & Training

    Insights And Happenings

    • Alert

      California Court rules on COVID reimbursement for remote work during Pandemic

      July 24, 2023
    • Alert

      California Supreme Court holds PAGA plaintiffs may pursue in-court lawsuits after arbitration in some circumstances

      July 17, 2023
    • Alert

      New York could become latest state to ban noncompete agreements

      June 26, 2023
    The foregoing has been prepared for the general information of clients and friends of the firm. It is not meant to provide legal advice with respect to any specific matter and should not be acted upon without professional counsel. If you have any questions or require any further information regarding these or other related matters, please contact your regular Nixon Peabody LLP representative. This material may be considered advertising under certain rules of professional conduct.

    Subscribe to stay informed of the latest legal news, alerts, and business trends.Subscribe

    • People
    • Capabilities
    • Insights
    • About
    • Locations
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Alumni
    • Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Statement of Client Rights
    • Purchase Order Terms & Conditions
    • Nixon Peabody International LLC
    • PAL
    © 2025 Nixon Peabody. All rights reserved