Nixon Peabody’s attorneys have provided compliance- and enforcement-related services to a variety of companies since the inception of Prop 65. We help clients evaluate their obligation for compliance and limit their exposure to the law. If we advise that a product needs a chemical warning, we provide guidance to clients through every step of the compliance process.
In addition to compliance counseling, our practice focuses on litigation, including the defense of claims and lawsuits alleging violations of Prop 65. For clients facing an enforcement action, we offer experience in negotiating resolutions and, if necessary, implementing effective defense strategies in litigation. Our Proposition 65 knowledge, combined with the firm’s wide-ranging litigation experience with environmental, consumer product, toxic tort, and class action claims, put clients in the best position for a successful outcome.
Our Proposition 65 experience
- Counseled and litigated numerous matters under Prop 65 (California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act)
- Representation of a full range of business from Fortune 500 companies through small manufacturers and importers just above the threshold for involvement in Proposition 65 claims
- Negotiated settlements with environmental advocacy groups and California’s Attorney General
- Defended petroleum-industry, bulk materials marketer in RCRA, CWA, CAA, and Prop 65 litigations
- Represent a national chain in Prop 65 litigation regarding second-hand tobacco smoke and diesel exhaust
- Defense and counseling in numerous Prop 65 matters brought by both private litigants and the State of California involving foods, dietary supplements, and a variety of consumer products, as well as cases involving environmental exposures and alleged discharges into sources of drinking water. Consumer products include:
- Potato chips and snack food
- Beauty products and cosmetic bags
- Children’s accessories
Chemicals we have dealt with under Prop 65 include acrylamide, lead, arsenic, mercury, toluene, benzene, 1,4-dioxane, formaldehyde, and phthalates.
- “Children’s Products: The CPSIA, CA’s Phthalate Regulation, and Proposition 65: Living in Harmony?” Law Journal Newsletters, Products Liability, Law & Strategy, Volume 29, Number 4, November 2009 (L. Michals and A. Epand).
- Webinar: “Recent Developments in the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, California’s Proposition 65, and Recent Phthalate Regulations: Not just for kids anymore.” 2009 (C. Collins).