Nixon Peabody’s Wage-Hour Litigation team is made up of experienced, savvy litigators who understand the unique issues that arise in wage-hour cases and have successfully resolved disputes ranging from single-plaintiff cases to complex class actions involving tens of thousands of class members with high damages exposure. We have decades of experience representing clients in state and federal courts, before administrative agencies, and on a multi-jurisdictional basis. These cases have involved a wide array of issues, including allegations of misclassification of exempt/nonexempt employees, “off-the-clock” work, miscalculated commissions, unpaid meal periods (arising from auto-deduction policies), regular rate calculations, and improper use of “comp time.”
Our wage-hour litigation strategy sets us apart. We have developed an effective, analytical framework to defend against these unique actions. Our methodology often includes conducting an early case assessment to evaluate the underlying merits of the case and potential procedural and substantive defenses, including well-developed strategies and tactics to defeat class certification. Our goal at all times is to determine the most cost-effective approach to defending the action in order to achieve either net settlement or trial advantage, while remaining attentive to the client’s overall business objectives.
Our Wage-Hour Defense practice covers all 50 states, but we have particular strength in areas that are seeing a surge in wage-hour actions, including California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. We have defeated motions for class certification (even at the conditional notice stage), won motions to dismiss or for summary judgment on the merits, and successfully negotiated creative class settlements (with high client-reverter amounts). We have extensive experience in many jurisdictions with particularly challenging state laws, such as New York’s six-year statute of limitations, California’s unique and often arcane provisions governing wages and class action lawsuits, and Massachusetts’ Wage Act, which requires mandatory trebling of damages. We have litigated frequently against the most active plaintiffs’ class action firms; we know their tactics, the way they think, and how they approach these cases. Our unique knowledge and experience often result in either limiting or defeating class certification, even in the most difficult cases.
Law360 | November 05, 2018
San Francisco Labor & Employment partners Bob Dolinko and Seth Neulight and Los Angeles Labor & Employment associate Irene Scholl-Tatevosyan are mentioned in this article for their representation of Hertz in a matter regarding employees wage and rest break.
SHRM.com (Society of Human Resource Management) | May 08, 2018
San Francisco labor and employment partner Seth Neulight is quoted in this article analyzing a California Supreme Court case, Troester v. Starbucks, that could decide whether employers there must pay employees for ‘de minimis’ time—amounts of working time that are hard to track.
Bender’s California Labor & Employment Bulletin | September 01, 2017
Los Angeles labor and employment counsel Dale Hudson and associate Irene Scholl-Tatevosyan authored this article on California’s wage and hour mandates for employers.
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin | June 19, 2017
Chicago labor and employment partner Frank Saibert authored this column about Vega v. New Forest Home Cemetery LLC, involving a seasonal employee’s alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standars Act and the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act.
Rochester Business Journal | June 16, 2017
Rochester private equity and investment funds partner Jeremy Wolk authored this column about the “Freelance Isn’t Free” Act, which was passed by the New York City Council and is the country’s first payment protection measure for freelance workers/non-employees.
SHRM | May 19, 2017
Los Angeles labor and employment associate Alicia Anderson is quoted in this article about a case involving restaurant chain P.F. Chang’s China Bistro Inc.’s employees’ fight for full minimum wage for non-tipped work.
Fast Company | October 19, 2016
Boston Labor & Employment partner Jeffrey Gilbreth is quoted throughout this article about the labor laws going into effect in December 2016, and ideas for employers to keep their staff members at 40 hours a week.
Employment Law Alert | 08.15.18
Employment Law Alert | 07.31.18
Employment Law Alert | 05.09.18
Employment Law Alert | 05.01.18
Employment Law Alert | 06.08.17