Discrimination & Harassment

Workforce management in a stagnant economy has been particularly challenging for employers as they try to manage their expenses and their bottom line. Business decisions, such as conducting layoffs and reductions in force, have contributed to an increase in discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims by former employees following the loss of their jobs. While employers often implement explicit codes of conduct for their workplace, discrimination and harassment behaviors can sometimes still linger. We are also seeing more and more class actions and collective claims filed by plaintiffs’ attorneys whose aggressive tactics have made the defense of these cases significantly more expensive. In this landscape, where emotions often run high and the potential financial exposure to companies is great, employers turn to Nixon Peabody Labor & Employment Litigation attorneys for a comprehensive, cost-effective winning strategy.

Discrimination and harassment litigation

Members of Nixon Peabody’s Labor & Employment Litigation practice are talented, skilled attorneys who have decades of experience defending complex and sometime-hostile discrimination and harassment litigation matters. From the outset, the team leverages their trial and investigative skills to win cases early by assessing their client’s risk and then developing a calculated litigation strategy geared toward saving our client from years of discovery and hundreds of thousands of dollars in attorneys’ fees, often avoiding a costly trial. Whether defending against hundreds of claimants or a single plaintiff case, our team has a proven track record of achieving the results our clients are seeking while containing litigation costs. Our attorneys also excel at blocking or containing class certification and executing offensive strategies, such as counterclaims and early dispositive motions.

We have represented clients in federal trial and appellate courts; state courts; the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC); and related federal, state, and local governmental agencies. These cases involve disparate treatment and impact claims and span the full range of protected categories, including race, sex, age, disability, veteran status, national origin, and religion, as well as issues arising from statutes such as the Family Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act. Our experience before the EEOC includes individual discrimination charges and class claims, as well as related investigations of compensation discrimination, failure to hire or promote, sexual harassment, wrongful discharge, retaliation, and disability discrimination.


Although an employer cannot insulate itself entirely from litigation, it can take steps to decrease its chances of being sued and maximize its ability to obtain a quick resolution at a relatively small cost. Our philosophy is to minimize the risk of workplace discrimination claims through proactive planning. We work collaboratively with our clients to conduct audits that include detailed compensation and data analyses to identify hidden statistical vulnerabilities, interviews of company personnel to gauge employee morale and satisfaction with diversity efforts, and recommendations to address areas of vulnerability.

We routinely assist our clients in identifying potential issues and minimizing the possibilities for liability by:

  • Reviewing policies and procedures and identifying issues that might support a disparate impact or “pattern and practice” claim of discrimination;
  • Revising and/or creating alternative policies and procedures, pay practices, or hiring/promotion/firing practices to minimize the risk of any discrimination claims;
  • Advising on diversity “best practices” and conducting diversity training; and
  • Providing harassment and discrimination prevention training.

Cuomo advances 2019 Women’s Justice Agenda with new job laws

Rochester Business Journal | August 16, 2019

Rochester Corporate partner Jeremy Wolk co-wrote this column on a pair of bills signed into law in New York that aim to curb pay discrimination due to gender or other differences.

Employment—disability—judicial estoppel

Rhode Island Lawyers Weekly | April 30, 2019

Partner Neal McNamara and associate Aaron Nadich, both of the Labor & Employment practice group in Providence, are mentioned for their successful representation of Honeywell in a disability discrimination suit.

Poorly pleaded discrimination case leaves court, defendants peeved

Chicago Daily Law Bulletin | February 12, 2019

Chicago Complex Commercial Disputes associate Laura Bacon wrote this contributed article analyzing a recent Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, which affirmed a lower court’s decision to dismiss with prejudice an employment discrimination suit in which the plaintiffs repeatedly failed to amend flaws in their filings.

EEOC's Costco case sheds light on Title VII liability

Law360 | November 14, 2018

Chicago Complex Commercial Disputes associate Laura Bacon and Labor & Employment associate Brittany Bogaerts, co-wrote this contributed article analyzing a Seventh Circuit ruling that held Costco responsible for a hostile work environment created by a customer harassing an employee.

New sexual harassment rules now in effect

The Daily Record | October 17, 2018

Rochester Labor & Employment associate Kim Harding is quoted extensively in this article about New York state’s new rules to curb workplace sexual harassment and how employers are taking a more proactive approach.

Ex-Indiana University professor loses race discrimination case

Chicago Daily Law Bulletin | October 10, 2018

Chicago Labor & Employment partner Frank Saibert wrote this contributed article analyzing a lawsuit filed by an Indiana University professor who blamed racial discrimination for the university’s decision to deny him tenure.

When the national discourse of sexual abuse seeps into the office

Long Island Business News | October 04, 2018

Long Island Labor & Employment associate Tony Dulgerian is quoted in this story about how employers can respond to the current national dialogue by having conversations with employees about workplace harassment.

Back to top